维恩图
计算机科学
图形模型
集合(抽象数据类型)
多样性(控制论)
灵活性(工程)
节点(物理)
图形显示
系统回顾
可视化
数据科学
数据挖掘
理论计算机科学
情报检索
人工智能
计算机图形学(图像)
程序设计语言
数学
数学教育
工程类
统计
法学
结构工程
梅德林
政治学
作者
Konstantinos I. Bougioukas,Elpida Vounzoulaki,Chrysanthi Mantsiou,Eliophotos Savvides,Christina Karakosta,Theodoros Diakonidis,Απόστολος Τσάπας,Anna‐Bettina Haidich
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.12.004
摘要
Background and Objective To introduce potential static tabular and graphical techniques for visually presenting overlap between systematic reviews (SRs) included in overviews of systematic reviews (OoSRs). Methods The graphical approaches described include Venn and Euler diagrams, as well as matrix-based, node-link, and aggregation-based techniques. We used fundamental concepts of mathematics from set and network theory to develop our novel graphical approaches. The graphical displays were created using R. Results Overview authors have the flexibility to choose from a variety of visualizations, depending on the characteristics of their study. If the OoSRs include few SRs, a Venn or an Euler diagram can be used. In case of OoSRs with more SRs, Upset plots, heatmaps, and node-link graphs are more appropriate for visualizing overlapping SRs. Stacked bar plots constitute an aggregation-based technique of illustrating overlap. Strengths and limitations of each graphical approach are presented. Conclusion The degree of overlap should be explored for the entire study and for specific outcomes of interest. The proposed graphical techniques may assist methodologists and authors in identifying overlap, which in turn may improve validity and transparency in OoSRs. More research is needed to understand which technique would be most useful and easiest to understand.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI