医学
结肠镜检查
内窥镜检查
麦克内马尔试验
置信区间
腺瘤
结直肠癌
内科学
胃肠病学
前瞻性队列研究
外科
癌症
数学
统计
作者
Carolin Zippelius,Saleh A. Alqahtani,J Schedel,D. Brookman-Amissah,Klaus Muehlenberg,Christoph Federle,Andrea Salzberger,W. Schorr,Oliver Pech
出处
期刊:Endoscopy
[Georg Thieme Verlag KG]
日期:2021-07-22
卷期号:54 (05): 465-472
被引量:21
摘要
Adenoma detection rate (ADR) varies significantly between endoscopists, with adenoma miss rates (AMRs) up to 26 %. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems may improve endoscopy quality and reduce the rate of interval cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of an AI system in real-time colonoscopy and its influence on AMR and ADR.This prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study analyzed patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy at a single endoscopy center in Germany from June to October 2020. Every patient was examined concurrently by an endoscopist and AI using two opposing screens. The AI system, overseen by a second observer, was not visible to the endoscopist. AMR was the primary outcome. Both methods were compared using McNemar test.150 patients were included (mean age 65 years [standard deviation 14]; 69 women). There was no significant or clinically relevant difference (P = 0.75) in AMR between the AI system (6/197, 3.0 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.1-6.5) and routine colonoscopy (4/197, 2.0 %; 95 %CI 0.6-5.1). The polyp miss rate of the AI system (14/311, 4.5 %; 95 %CI 2.5-7.4) was not significantly different (P = 0.72) from routine colonoscopy (17/311, 5.5 %; 95 %CI 3.2-8.6). There was no significant difference (P = 0.50) in ADR between routine colonoscopy (78/150, 52.0 %; 95 %CI 43.7-60.2) and the AI system (76/150, 50.7 %; 95 %CI 42.4-58.9). Routine colonoscopy detected adenomas in two patients that were missed by the AI system.The AI system performance was comparable to that of experienced endoscopists during real-time colonoscopy with similar high ADR (> 50 %).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI