A Meta‐Analysis of Conductive and Strong Carbon Nanotube Materials

Abstract A study of 1304 data points collated over 266 papers statistically evaluates the relationships between carbon nanotube (CNT) material characteristics, including: electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties; ampacity; density; purity; microstructure alignment; molecular dimensions and graphitic perfection; and doping. Compared to conductive polymers and graphitic intercalation compounds, which have exceeded the electrical conductivity of copper, CNT materials are currently one‐sixth of copper's conductivity, mechanically on‐par with synthetic or carbon fibers, and exceed all the other materials in terms of a multifunctional metric. Doped, aligned few‐wall CNTs (FWCNTs) are the most superior CNT category; from this, the acid‐spun fiber subset are the most conductive, and the subset of fibers directly spun from floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition are strongest on a weight basis. The thermal conductivity of multiwall CNT material rivals that of FWCNT materials. Ampacity follows a diameter‐dependent power‐law from nanometer to millimeter scales. Undoped, aligned FWCNT material reaches the intrinsic conductivity of CNT bundles and single‐crystal graphite, illustrating an intrinsic limit requiring doping for copper‐level conductivities. Comparing an assembly of CNTs (forming mesoscopic bundles, then macroscopic material) to an assembly of graphene (forming single‐crystal graphite crystallites, then carbon fiber), the ≈1 µm room‐temperature, phonon‐limited mean‐free‐path shared between graphene, metallic CNTs, and activated semiconducting CNTs is highlighted, deemphasizing all metallic helicities for CNT power transmission applications.