医学
临床终点
随机对照试验
不利影响
外科
内科学
作者
Kimberly J. Butterwick,Ellen S. Marmur,Vic A. Narurkar,Sue Ellen Cox,John Joseph,Neil S. Sadick,Ruth Tedaldi,Sarah Wheeler,Julia K. Kolodziejczyk,Conor J. Gallagher
出处
期刊:Dermatologic Surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2015-11-24
卷期号:41 (12): 1351-1360
被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1097/dss.0000000000000576
摘要
This trial compares the effectiveness and safety of HYC-24L (Juvéderm Ultra XC; Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland) (24 mg/mL of hyaluronic acid, 0.3% lidocaine) and CPM-22.5 (Belotero Balance; Merz Aesthetics, Raleigh, NC) (22.5 mg/mL of hyaluronic acid) for the treatment of perioral lines.Men and women aged 35 years or older with moderate-to-severe perioral lines were recruited for this randomized controlled, rater-blinded, 2-arm trial. The primary endpoint was a comparison of rater-assessed responder rates by the validated 4-point Perioral Lines Severity Scale at Month 6; responders were those who showed a ≥1 point improvement. A secondary endpoint was subject-assessed change in perioral lines measured by the Global Assessment of Change Scale.A total of 136 subjects received treatment and 132 completed the trial (mean age: 58 ± 8 years). Total volume injected was 1.18 mL (HYC-24L) and 1.32 mL (CPM-22.5). At Month 6, a significantly greater proportion of HYC-24L subjects responded to treatment (87%) than CPM-22.5 subjects (72%) (p < .04). At all time points, HYC-24L subjects reported significantly greater improvement in their perioral lines than CPM-22.5 subjects, with the greatest difference at Month 6. No unexpected adverse events occurred.HYC-24L subjects showed a higher response rate and a greater improvement in their perioral lines than CPM-22.5 subjects for up to 6 months.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI