Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Medicine for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 科克伦图书馆 不利影响 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 中医药 内科学 置信区间 2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19) 相对风险 传统医学
作者
Hanting Wu,Rongchen Dai,Xiaqiu Wu,Qiushuang Li,Hanti Lu,Junchao Yang,Wei Mao,Peijie Hei,Juan Liang,Conghua Ji
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Chinese Medicine [World Scientific]
卷期号:: 1-17
标识
DOI:10.1142/s0192415x22500136
摘要

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19 treatment with a focus on the benefits of symptomatic relief and time-related indexes. Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, Wanfang Data, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry) were systematically searched from their beginning to April 2021. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patients using Western therapy (WT) alone and those using additional Chinese medicine (WT [Formula: see text] CM) were included. Primary outcomes included overall efficacy, lung recovery, and time to viral assay conversion. Secondary outcomes included time and rate of individual symptom recovery, laboratory indicators, and adverse events. Overall, 15 RCTs, including 1469 participants, were included in this review. WT [Formula: see text] CM significantly improved overall efficacy (risk ratio, RR [Formula: see text] 1.21; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.30; [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] 0.01) and lung recovery (RR [Formula: see text] 1.30; 95% CI:1.19 to 1.42; [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] 0.01) and shortened the time to viral assay conversion (weighted mean differences, WMD [Formula: see text]1.38; 95% CI: −1.98 to −0.78; [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] 0.01) and duration of chest distress (WMD [Formula: see text] 2.41; 95% CI: −2.99 to −1.83; [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] 0.01) compared to WT alone. There was no difference in safety between the WT [Formula: see text] CM and WT groups (RR [Formula: see text] 0.94; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.39; [Formula: see text] 0.76). In conclusion, the synthesized evidence from 15 RCTs showed that additional Chinese medication may improve treatment efficacy, relieve symptoms, promote lung recovery, and reduce the inflammatory response against COVID-19, while not increasing the risk of adverse events compared with conventional Western medication alone.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
丘比特应助风车车采纳,获得10
刚刚
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Ava应助Arm采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
Ditf完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
cm发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
wky完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
苹果莫言完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
LiRan发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
封闭货车完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
周周发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
领导范儿应助Moon采纳,获得10
7秒前
风很大完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Yangbingang发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
SciGPT应助VC采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
张娜完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
jrzsy完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
喷火娃发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
ding应助草莓声明采纳,获得20
15秒前
南枫发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
永刚完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
觅香发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
smile完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
BERRY050发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
小蘑菇应助靓丽的雪碧采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
Quality by Design - An Indispensable Approach to Accelerate Biopharmaceutical Product Development 800
Pulse width control of a 3-phase inverter with non sinusoidal phase voltages 777
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
A Social and Cultural History of the Hellenistic World 500
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 15 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6397529
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8212793
关于积分的说明 17401122
捐赠科研通 5450855
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2881103
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1857661
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1699693