Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Earnestlee完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Triumph完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
碧蓝访风完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
嗯哼哈哈发布了新的文献求助50
5秒前
Dr_Stars完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
9秒前
科目三应助搞怪元彤采纳,获得10
9秒前
短腿柯基完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Dr_Stars发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
隐形曼青应助朴素问旋采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
星河入梦来完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
13秒前
家伟发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
粗心小熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
平淡菠萝完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
富有的书竹完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
西瓜发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Gavin发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
Carlotta完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
小李发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
酒袋发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
shark发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
21秒前
搞怪元彤发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高公子发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
yyy发布了新的文献求助30
21秒前
yg28完成签到,获得积分0
22秒前
摸鱼学原理完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
xu发布了新的文献求助30
23秒前
23秒前
HAL9000完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
阿鹿462发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
liuxinyu发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
三三完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
高公子完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
Prescott's Microbiology: 2026 Release ISE 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Environmental Leverage in Times of Climate Crisis: Product Standards, Carbon Border Measures and Preferential Trade Agreements 1000
Interactions of Vowel Quality and Prosody in East Slavic 1000
Erwählung und Berufung bei Paulus: Bedeutung, Entwicklung und Funktion einer Vorstellung in ihrem frühjüdischen und griechisch-römischen Kontext 850
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7190704
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8827836
关于积分的说明 18637930
捐赠科研通 6824756
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3175072
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2326409
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2149466