亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 结直肠癌 癌症 程序设计语言
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
4秒前
5秒前
loii举报shawarma的求助涉嫌违规
18秒前
小邋遢发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高兴夏之完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
czx的应助被dxxcshin采纳,获得200
33秒前
36秒前
七七完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
dxxcshin完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
整齐的天问完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
48秒前
1分钟前
个性鹭洋完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
优秀笑柳完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
琳io完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
小邋遢完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
辛勤的冰珍完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
王慧琳完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
zhouzhou完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
月亮完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
v0id的应助被忧郁思远采纳,获得10
2分钟前
合适立诚完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
可一可再完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
urologywang完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
虚幻的雁山完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
feiyafei完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
沉默的樱完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Qing完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
糟糕的访波完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
loii完成签到,获得积分0
3分钟前
小蝶完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
炙热迎天完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
科研通AI6.4的应助被huanhuanhuan采纳,获得10
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Représentation chimique de la structure des kérogènes et des asphaltènes en fonction de leur origine et de leur degré d'évolution 800
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8056737
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9482553
关于积分的说明 21313143
捐赠科研通 7624570
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3394748
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2525741
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2433029