Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
斯文忆梅发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
yyds发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
lli完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
晚安完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
淏瀚完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
地球发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
渴望者发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
春分发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
七月夏栀完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
烟花应助枫行采纳,获得10
6秒前
无心的傲柏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
vandi应助shirley采纳,获得10
6秒前
张二十八发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
可爱的函函应助jianzhong张采纳,获得10
8秒前
若黎发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
顾矜应助152455采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
Leucalypt发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
领导范儿应助小张同学采纳,获得10
9秒前
yu完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
yuzihang完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
li发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
复杂冰露完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
科研通AI6.3应助阿易采纳,获得10
12秒前
Akim应助KKKZ采纳,获得10
14秒前
波妞发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
肖坤发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
Li完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
闪击正太完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
全员动态考核,锚定高质量发展:读懂同济大学教师人事改革新政的深层价值 900
Health Psychology 800
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7595178
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9171949
关于积分的说明 19633791
捐赠科研通 7172523
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3267793
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432592
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2260843