亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
东风即是东风完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
馆长举报机灵的雨文求助涉嫌违规
31秒前
37秒前
成就迎波完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
Un_effort发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
搞怪的盛男完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Moto_Fang完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
干净的醉蝶完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
干净书双完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
笑不出来发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
野性的柠檬完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
馆长举报王一求助涉嫌违规
2分钟前
科研通AI6.4应助笑不出来采纳,获得10
2分钟前
朴实无招完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
乐乐应助honda采纳,获得10
3分钟前
科研通AI6.2应助不周采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
IVY发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
不周发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
沈惠映完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
拼搏的水桃完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
IVY发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
笑不出来发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
动听一德完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
外向的小海豚完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
馆长举报Maestro_S求助涉嫌违规
6分钟前
IVY发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
6分钟前
年轻的幼菱完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
乐观的星月完成签到 ,获得积分0
6分钟前
honda发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
大马宝蛋应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
化工安全与环保 1000
Autoparametric Resonance in Mechanical Systems 1000
基于锂离子电池正极材料回收的绿色溶剂开发及工程化应用研究 800
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 600
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7651235
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9222602
关于积分的说明 19801900
捐赠科研通 7216567
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3278494
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2439349
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2277213