Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 结直肠癌 癌症 程序设计语言
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
maketurbo发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
追寻夜香完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
LHL完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
littlejin完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
kyle完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
LYQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
优美的镜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Criminology34应助寒2026采纳,获得10
10秒前
EE5577完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
zyb完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
slj发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
14秒前
EE5577发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
纸条条完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
zf发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
含蓄的笙完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
为为的小耳朵完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
薛强完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
ChengYonghui完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
怀亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
大力元霜发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
旺仔QQ完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
英姑应助柔弱小懒虫采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
152894完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
托托完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
natus完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
Sodagreen2023完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
152894发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
王坤完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
彪悍的熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
小资完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
慕容杏子完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
大力诺言完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
李成恩完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
愚者先生完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
面壁的章北海完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 750
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7529628
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9115460
关于积分的说明 19468506
捐赠科研通 7130269
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3256112
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2423867
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2243703