Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
gy完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
草珊瑚完成签到 ,获得积分20
1秒前
sylinmm完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
yiluyouni完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
Findme发布了新的文献求助60
4秒前
ZC完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
junjun完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
AK完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
NexusExplorer应助瘦瘦的枫叶采纳,获得10
6秒前
luluyang完成签到 ,获得积分0
7秒前
HJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
不穷知识完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
Cheng2026完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
zuoshoubo完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Ranann完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
俞孤风完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
贤惠的人龙完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
jzmulyl完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
早睡完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
xiaoxiao完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
njzhangyanyang完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
凌尘完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
执着完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
12366666完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
七龙珠完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
安详靖柏完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
liuliu梅完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
李静雯完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
d_fishier完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
谦让鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
小丁发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
123456qqqq完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
机智乐菱完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
清冷渊完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
DIPPR Project 801 - Full Version 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7765974
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9309963
关于积分的说明 20313419
捐赠科研通 7350773
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3315010
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2464543
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2329592