Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
奋斗朋友发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
曹小妍完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
sxy完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
刚刚
大王叫我来巡山完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
机智初夏发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
小蘑菇应助风信子deon01采纳,获得10
1秒前
三分之一星辰完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
cbbb完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
bubble嘞发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
百宝发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Akim应助cxf采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
vv发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
桐桐应助sarto采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6.1应助Sam十九采纳,获得10
3秒前
感动城完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
我爱行楷完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
智闭郑完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
LiuYikun发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
吴军霄完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
凉雨渲发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
XJL关闭了XJL文献求助
5秒前
充电宝应助linlind采纳,获得10
5秒前
混元形意太极门完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
zxx完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
tyr发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
无疾而终发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
时亦发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
久松真一著作集〈第5巻〉禅と芸術 500
Fundamentals of Modern Mathematics: A Practical Review (Dover Books on Mathematics) 500
Cold War Transcended: Australia's China Policy, 1949-1990 470
Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age, 2nd Edition 400
Moore's Clinically Oriented Anatomy 10th Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6616224
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8380810
关于积分的说明 17929178
捐赠科研通 5784747
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2959508
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1934716
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1838740