Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
程程程完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
大个应助arniu2008采纳,获得10
2秒前
cata完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
李浩然完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
若水完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
郭濹涵完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
7秒前
kingyuan完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Ao_Jiang完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
研自助完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
琉璃完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
kathy完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
朱洪帆发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Yanz发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
帅男完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
冬日空虚应助风清扬采纳,获得10
15秒前
Orange应助球球采纳,获得10
16秒前
kk完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
大模型应助lx采纳,获得10
18秒前
崔康佳完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
单纯的小土豆完成签到 ,获得积分0
20秒前
23秒前
23秒前
25秒前
偷得浮生半日闲完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
包包琪完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
所所应助lx采纳,获得10
27秒前
淡淡的靖完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
yk完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
现代完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
arniu2008发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
旺旺发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
彳亍完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
Nature应助弥淮采纳,获得10
30秒前
31秒前
大意的火龙果完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
fuluyuzhe_668完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
科研通AI6.3应助彳亍采纳,获得10
34秒前
杨飞完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
高分求助中
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 680
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Organic Reactions Volume 118 400
A Foreign Missionary on the Long March: The Unpublished Memoirs of Arnolis Hayman of the China Inland Mission 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6459163
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8268343
关于积分的说明 17621504
捐赠科研通 5528320
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2905905
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1882616
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1727721