Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
科研通AI6.1应助vv采纳,获得10
1秒前
EricBao发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
顺意完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
XMH发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
拉长的绮梅完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
xyz完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
潇洒的惋清应助高烽采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
谦让的靖巧完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
xyz发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
温暖的从云完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
GPTea应助腼腆的修杰采纳,获得20
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
Tony发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
鲤鱼翼完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
简单山水发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
慈祥的惜梦应助cleva采纳,获得10
15秒前
lv发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
天天快乐应助羞涩的菲鹰采纳,获得10
15秒前
文艺绿柳发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
CC发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
流浪文献发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
安详友安发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
科研通AI6.2应助yz采纳,获得20
23秒前
唐雨欣完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
爱笑果汁发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
FashionBoy应助不安水蓝采纳,获得10
25秒前
清修发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
Jasper应助龚伟阳采纳,获得10
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6522326
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8315537
关于积分的说明 17789933
捐赠科研通 5624445
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2927889
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1904676
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1764702