Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
酥饼发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
OK应助satchzhao采纳,获得10
7秒前
lily完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
fyj完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
xxx完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
迅速的千风完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
rr完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
墨蓝完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
刘亦菲暧昧对象完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
anzhiyuan完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
QIU完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
Ander完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
FLL发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
rr发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
congxin发布了新的文献求助200
20秒前
墨蓝发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
24秒前
24秒前
lxg完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
跳不起来的大神完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
anzhiyuan发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
carly完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
华华华发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
Wen完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
xh完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
planA完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
jrzsy完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
Jeremy完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
怡然乐巧完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
tyro完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
蓬莱依月完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
husky完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
41秒前
典雅的宝马完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
yangyangyang完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
华华华发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
喜东东完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
Understanding Acculturation: The Process of Cultural Adjustment as Applied to International Migration 700
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7370934
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8978519
关于积分的说明 19087621
捐赠科研通 7012975
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3224993
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2388627
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2205666