Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
专注的书雁完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
热心的梦桃完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
陈洁佳完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI6.2应助feisun采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6.1应助冷静的豪采纳,获得10
2秒前
彳亍发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小二郎应助小赵采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
xu230501完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
奔放的老青年完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小刀yeye完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
852应助皮卡丘采纳,获得10
5秒前
DNE完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
高大伟宸关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
急急急发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
CodeCraft应助肥波采纳,获得10
7秒前
狂野元枫完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
心动小宋发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
for_abSCI完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
祖安诳人完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
小栩发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Ycz完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
DNE发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
无辜问玉完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Owen应助神威无敌大猫子炮采纳,获得10
9秒前
邱燈完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
陈富贵完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
紧张的秋完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
刘佳欣发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
CodeCraft应助nancy采纳,获得10
11秒前
xcw完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
充电宝应助苏素肃采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Merrill's Atlas of Radiographic Positioning and Procedures - 3-Volume Set, 16th Edition 2000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 540
Interactions of Vowel Quality and Prosody in East Slavic 500
Vander's Renal Physiology第10版 500
Materials Informatics Molecules, Crystals and Beyond A volume in Acta Materialia Book Series 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7067815
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8728867
关于积分的说明 18472573
捐赠科研通 6599175
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3126488
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2222818
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2101954