Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
正直凡灵的应助被FartKing采纳,获得10
刚刚
2秒前
彭于晏的应助被辛坦夫采纳,获得10
3秒前
打打的应助被唐璜采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被sdu小智采纳,获得10
3秒前
YiyueChan完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
圆圆发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
李书溪完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
勤恳的金鱼完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
xianyaoz完成签到 ,获得积分0
7秒前
小二郎的应助被20采纳,获得10
8秒前
宁戎发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
pdmnc发布了新的文献求助50
8秒前
Bai发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
当当完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Akim的应助被马晓露采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
ttt完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被alianleo采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
Nole的应助被CUCUMBER采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
唐璜发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
隐形曼青的应助被cencen采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
Ceremony1718完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
小二郎的应助被wonder采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
唐璜发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
bkagyin的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
Chinese Traditional Wisdom and Contemporary Education Values 600
AI Disclosure in Annual Reports: Evolution, Determinants, and Capital Market Participants’ Perceptions 500
5th World Conference on Detergents: Reinventing the Industry : Opportunities and Challenges 500
Erzählte Gnade 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8106147
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9514936
关于积分的说明 21494918
捐赠科研通 7682535
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3409852
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2537519
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2449971