亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
寻雪发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
不刻苦的刻苦完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
何时发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
青柠发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
aslink完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
北暖完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
默然发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
南星完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
zzx完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
柠檬牙完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
爱听歌不乐完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Ltydioaaap发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
青柠完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
Xx应助大力的图图采纳,获得10
23秒前
dynamoo应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
25秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
29秒前
活着毕业完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
何时完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
小巧的松思完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
LYL完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
Nori完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
虚拟的柠檬完成签到,获得积分0
38秒前
40秒前
寻雪完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
47秒前
烂漫的慕卉完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
星辰大海应助TT采纳,获得30
52秒前
1分钟前
wayne完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
失眠依珊完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
王者归来完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7556293
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9138675
关于积分的说明 19533466
捐赠科研通 7147073
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3261177
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2427641
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2250321