清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
RJ完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
ffff完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
胡萝卜完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
妃子完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
两个榴莲完成签到,获得积分0
40秒前
Autin完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
bkagyin应助assiance采纳,获得10
2分钟前
hanyuvhen完成签到,获得积分20
2分钟前
有人应助hanyuvhen采纳,获得10
2分钟前
CC完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
欣欣完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
LINDENG2004完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
4分钟前
我是笨蛋完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
assiance给assiance的求助进行了留言
4分钟前
宁赴湘完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
5分钟前
assiance发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
5分钟前
androabo发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
呆萌如容完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
科研通AI6.2应助androabo采纳,获得30
6分钟前
6分钟前
铁瓜李完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
Yuyu完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7分钟前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8分钟前
8分钟前
8分钟前
慧子完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
rljsrljs完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
欣喜的人龙完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
9分钟前
光亮豌豆完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
诸葛平卉完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Handbook of Optical Systems,Volume 6:Advanced Physical Optics 666
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6515520
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8308654
关于积分的说明 17757221
捐赠科研通 5617530
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2925057
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1902049
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1763389