Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
惜海完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Jacques完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
生活的花完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1111发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
FATYE发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
梦钰发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
平淡寒梅完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
q6157完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
悦耳破茧完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
琳琳完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
田様应助昔Xi采纳,获得10
5秒前
归尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
生活的花发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
Nole应助义气幼珊采纳,获得10
7秒前
科研通AI6.4应助Le采纳,获得30
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
56完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
琳琳发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Nole应助发大财采纳,获得10
11秒前
曾礽发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Albert完成签到,获得积分0
13秒前
13秒前
夜夜完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
天天快乐应助平淡寒梅采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
脑洞疼应助hyyyh采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
七七完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
xcydd发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
糊涂的香彤完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
Alence880发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
20秒前
EvaHo完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7277161
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8898168
关于积分的说明 18816557
捐赠科研通 6949759
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3206458
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2377437
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2181341