Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小灰灰发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
疯狂的绿蝶完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
哦吼发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
苻颜完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
tt发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Bob发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
李成博完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
lll发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
tjyangbo发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
王俊发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
乐乐的应助被直率雪曼采纳,获得10
4秒前
超级寒凝完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
隐形曼青的应助被Wyh采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
朴实的手套完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
QQ完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
Bob完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
赘婿的应助被哦吼采纳,获得10
8秒前
汉堡包的应助被章鱼采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
ycsl完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
小灰灰完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
lane完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
flhsjjk发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
穆雨发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
禾苑完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
桐桐的应助被南星采纳,获得10
12秒前
吴祥佳完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Mahogany完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
The Dawn of Philology 520
Organizational Behavior 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (4th ed.) 310
中国器官捐献和移植发展报告(2024) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7821847
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9348782
关于积分的说明 20549553
捐赠科研通 7414570
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3333108
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2479068
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2353497