已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小王完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
自由飞翔发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
俏皮时光完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
所所的应助被儒雅听枫采纳,获得10
3秒前
Chang完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
俏皮时光发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
allover完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
林勇德完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
何为完成签到 ,获得积分0
11秒前
ataybabdallah完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
漾漾的羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
小二郎的应助被司马立果采纳,获得10
12秒前
仁爱的鹤轩完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
自由紫伊完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
自然的听南完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
明明完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
molihuakai的应助被望海皆星辰采纳,获得10
20秒前
23秒前
施宛儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
blue发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
CC完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
狂野狂野人完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
Zhao完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
正直的爆米花完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
XI关闭了XI的文献求助
36秒前
GAP完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
37秒前
38秒前
Gustav_Lebon发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
无奈的绾绾完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
45秒前
捡破烂的完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
47秒前
49秒前
郝从安发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
叠氮完成签到,获得积分20
50秒前
文静大神完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
53秒前
53秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (GGB), Band 5: Pro–Soz 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 7: R–S 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 1: A–B 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7791954
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9329203
关于积分的说明 20427260
捐赠科研通 7381571
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3323563
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2471399
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2340661