亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
黎黎发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
2秒前
小林的火恐龙完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
小林的火恐龙完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
从容飞雪完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
小马完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
包容幻莲完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
21秒前
wanci的应助被wd1994采纳,获得10
23秒前
24秒前
serendipity完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
熙熙攘攘完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
负责元瑶完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
crystal完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
归尘发布了新的文献求助80
27秒前
28秒前
window1000发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
浅亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
Nobodyet完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
酷炫的爆米花完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
斯文白柏发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
友好巧曼完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
自律完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
深情的迎海完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
39秒前
SciGPT的应助被dudupig采纳,获得10
44秒前
小二郎的应助被斯文白柏采纳,获得10
44秒前
46秒前
小马甲的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
48秒前
科研通AI2S的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
48秒前
xiaoming完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
悦耳的半兰完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
51秒前
dudupig发布了新的文献求助10
56秒前
YY完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
58秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被YY采纳,获得10
1分钟前
domingo发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Représentation chimique de la structure des kérogènes et des asphaltènes en fonction de leur origine et de leur degré d'évolution 900
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Ecotourism 400
Analytical Separation Science 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8065903
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9488337
关于积分的说明 21346614
捐赠科研通 7634211
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3397781
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2527746
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2435690