Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:36
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
yyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
陆千万完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xiong完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
英俊qiang完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
达不溜完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
乐观的颦发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
涛涛完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
飞船发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
海德堡完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小小zoe发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
独孤刘完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
王宇琦完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
不着四六的岁月完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
gshaoooo完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
YeeLeeLee完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Synan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小陀螺完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
内向的凌旋完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
宁日富一日完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
lxcy0612完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
杨永佳666完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
fhghhhjh完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Zada完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
佼佼者完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
1s完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
稀饭红红儿完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
ccccccp完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
孤独的AD钙完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
玖拾贰完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
Charlie完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
王小明完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
安子歌完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Zo完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
zhanfan321完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Principles of town planning : translating concepts to applications 500
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6059416
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7891983
关于积分的说明 16298703
捐赠科研通 5203615
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2783979
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1766692
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1647203