Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
来看文献发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
天天快乐应助看文献采纳,获得10
2秒前
丘比特应助郭勇慧采纳,获得10
2秒前
充电宝应助浮沉采纳,获得10
2秒前
机智雪糕发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小马猪发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
乱红完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
三更笔舞完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
如意夜云完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Khoa完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
Sky发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高兴的南晴完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
共享精神应助标致幼菱采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
Lifel完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
浮沉发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
独特冬莲发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
奔跑应助等待姿采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
小马猪完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
可爱的函函应助Xianhe采纳,获得10
18秒前
小鸭子发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
小程完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
张大拿完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
甘乐发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
cdercder应助wangbq采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
独特冬莲完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
高高的从波完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
郭勇慧发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
高分求助中
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
Electric machines: theory, operating applications, and controls 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
When Is Two-Stage Sample Robust Optimization Asymptotically Optimal? 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7602986
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9178964
关于积分的说明 19657254
捐赠科研通 7178259
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3269121
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2433276
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2262961