亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:36
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
栗子发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
BYGYHQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
licrazy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
GlockieZhao完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
6秒前
Annie完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
12秒前
研友_enPaaZ完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
pathway发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
shaylie完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
研友_enPaaZ发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
25秒前
weimin完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
中中完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
大个应助weimin采纳,获得10
31秒前
虚幻尔烟关注了科研通微信公众号
32秒前
LSH发布了新的文献求助30
32秒前
英姑应助鉴湖采纳,获得10
34秒前
栗子完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
小羊发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
彭于晏应助pathway采纳,获得10
38秒前
LSH完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
CipherSage应助追寻的傲芙采纳,获得10
42秒前
陈玉发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
wanci应助轻松的大树采纳,获得10
45秒前
小羊完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
53秒前
Lucas应助licrazy采纳,获得10
53秒前
David应助甜心糖采纳,获得30
58秒前
icypz628发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
广州小肥羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
licrazy发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
samsahpiyaz发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
漂亮的秋天完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
shelly0621发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
Entre Praga y Madrid: los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Horngren's Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis 17th edition 600
Tactics in Contemporary Drug Design 500
Russian Politics Today: Stability and Fragility (2nd Edition) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6086359
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7916085
关于积分的说明 16376721
捐赠科研通 5219968
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2790787
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1773960
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1649615