Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
qiqi完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
绯红逍遥发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
HYC完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
李爱国应助Azoom采纳,获得10
7秒前
QY发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
超级拖延症完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
科研通AI6.2应助小自采纳,获得10
12秒前
爱玛爱玛完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
粗心的棉花糖完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
R不可挡应助墨与白采纳,获得10
22秒前
海蓝云天应助学渣中渣采纳,获得20
22秒前
25秒前
25秒前
三尺微命完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
现代的南风完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
好学的泷泷完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
Alrite完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
范良聪完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
orixero应助mayun95采纳,获得10
33秒前
早早完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
美满的珠发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
xufund发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
egret完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
WQ完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
梦鱼完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
Danish完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
37秒前
40秒前
再学一分钟完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
41秒前
坚强飞兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
42秒前
kun完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
Azoom发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
内向的幻梅完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
飞飞鱼完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
czj完成签到,获得积分0
46秒前
48秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Various Faces of Animal Metaphor in English and Polish 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Photodetectors: From Ultraviolet to Infrared 500
On the Dragon Seas, a sailor's adventures in the far east 500
Yangtze Reminiscences. Some Notes And Recollections Of Service With The China Navigation Company Ltd., 1925-1939 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6353255
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8168245
关于积分的说明 17192085
捐赠科研通 5409372
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2863734
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1841018
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1689834