Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation

医学 结肠镜检查 卷积神经网络 试验装置 泻药 集合(抽象数据类型) 计算机科学 人工智能 外科 内科学 癌症 程序设计语言 结直肠癌
作者
Ji Young Lee,Audrey H. Calderwood,William E. Karnes,James Requa,Brian C. Jacobson,Michael B. Wallace
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:95 (3): 512-518.e1 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041
摘要

A reliable assessment of bowel preparation is important to ensure high-quality colonoscopy. Current bowel preparation scoring systems are limited by interobserver variability. This study aimed to demonstrate objective assessment of bowel preparation adequacy using an artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm developed from colonoscopy videos.Two CNNs were developed using a training set of 73,304 images from 200 colonoscopies. First, a binary CNN was developed and trained to distinguish video frames that were appropriate versus inappropriate for scoring with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A second multiclass CNN was developed and trained on 26,950 appropriate frames that were expertly annotated with BBPS segment scores (0-3). We validated the algorithm using 252 10-second video clips that were assigned BBPS segment scores by 2 experts. The algorithm provided mean BBPS scores based on the algorithm (AI-BBPS) by calculating mean BBPS based on each frame's scoring. We maximized the algorithm's performance by choosing a dichotomized AI-BBPS score that closely matched dichotomized BBPS scores (ie, adequate vs inadequate). We tested the mean BBPS score based on the algorithm AI-BBPS against human rating using 30 independent 10-second video clips (test set 1) and 10 full withdrawal colonoscopy videos (test set 2).In the validation set, the algorithm demonstrated an area under the curve of .918 and accuracy of 85.3% for detection of inadequate bowel cleanliness. In test set 1, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 76.7% to 83.3%. In test set 2, sensitivity for inadequate bowel preparation for each segment was 100% and agreement between raters and AI was 68.9% to 89.7%. Agreement between raters alone versus raters and AI were similar (κ = .694 and .649, respectively).The algorithm assessment of bowel cleanliness as measured with the BBPS showed good performance and agreement with experts including full withdrawal colonoscopies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
CipherSage应助真德秀先生采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
accept完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小蘑菇应助曾经的路灯采纳,获得10
3秒前
5秒前
momo完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
顶顶顶发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
Charming完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
浙西南呱呱完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
JYJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
曼波哈基米完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
jyp111完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
zuoyou完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
MM完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
yili完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
kk完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
yyf发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
斯文败类应助wanvdphelys采纳,获得10
19秒前
打打应助没所谓采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
wang完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
23秒前
24秒前
tqw完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
今后应助顶顶顶采纳,获得10
24秒前
哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
复杂鱼完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
Owen应助冷静的牛青采纳,获得10
25秒前
Singularity发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
27秒前
结实的山菡完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
隐形曼青应助曾经的路灯采纳,获得10
27秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Health and Wellbeing for Babies and Children 800
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7545852
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9129358
关于积分的说明 19504101
捐赠科研通 7140306
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3258976
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2426277
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2247383