医学
左炔诺孕酮
宫内节育器
子宫内膜息肉
息肉切除术
产科
患者满意度
妇科
宫腔镜检查
计划生育
外科
人口
内科学
结肠镜检查
研究方法
癌症
结直肠癌
环境卫生
作者
Myrthe M. van Dijk,Nehalennia van Hanegem,Maria E. de Lange,Anne Timmermans
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.06.016
摘要
We performed a literature review of reports comparing a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) with transcervical polyp resection (TCRP) as a treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Our second objective was to investigate the effectiveness of LNG-IUD and TCRP in reducing menstrual bleeding and the patient satisfaction with each technique. No previously reported studies have compared TCRP and LNG-IUD as treatment for HMB in premenopausal women with an endometrial polyp. Likewise, no studies are available on LNG-IUD as a treatment for HMB in the presence of an endometrial polyp. Several studies have found the LNG-IUD to be an effective treatment option for HMB, with high patient satisfaction rates. Evidence of the effectiveness of TCRP as treatment of HMB is scarce. Patient satisfaction is reported relatively good, although persistent or recurrent symptoms appear to be frequent. We conclude that no evidence is available on LNG-IUD as treatment for HMB in women with an endometrial polyp. We hypothesize that LNG-IUD could be a good alternative to TCRP for treating HMB in premenopausal women with a polyp; however, further evidence is needed, and a randomized controlled trial should be performed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI