乙苯
色谱法
气相色谱法
空白
化学
线性回归
甲苯
检出限
分析化学(期刊)
统计
数学
有机化学
材料科学
复合材料
作者
Mohd Marsin Sanagi,Susie Lu Ling,Zalilah Nasir,Dadan Hermawan,Wan Aini Wan Ibrahim,Ahmedy Abu Naim
出处
期刊:Journal of AOAC International
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2009-11-01
卷期号:92 (6): 1833-1838
被引量:129
标识
DOI:10.1093/jaoac/92.6.1833
摘要
LOD and LOQ are two important performance characteristics in method validation. This work compares three methods based on the International Conference on Harmonization and EURACHEM guidelines, namely, signal-to-noise, blank determination, and linear regression, to estimate the LOD and LOQ for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by experimental methodology using GC. Five VOCs, toluene, ethylbenzene, isopropylbenzene, n-propylbenzene, and styrene, were chosen for the experimental study. The results indicated that the estimated LODs and LOQs were not equivalent and could vary by a factor of 5 to 6 for the different methods. It is, therefore, essential to have a clearly described procedure for estimating the LOD and LOQ during method validation to allow interlaboratory comparisons.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI