The Relationship between Co‐rumination and Internalizing Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

沉思 心理学 荟萃分析 临床心理学 发展心理学 认知 精神科 医学 内科学
作者
Jason S. Spendelow,Laura M. Simonds,Rachel E. Avery
出处
期刊:Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy [Wiley]
卷期号:24 (2): 512-527 被引量:65
标识
DOI:10.1002/cpp.2023
摘要

Co-rumination refers to the process of engaging in repeated discussion of personal problems in dyadic relationships. The current systematic review and meta-analysis provided an evaluation of the relationship between co-rumination and internalizing problems in children, adolescents and young adults, along with an investigation of potential moderator variables. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they quantitatively assessed the relationship between co-rumination and depression, anxiety and/or internalizing problems using validated measures. An electronic search was conducted in PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane Library database of systematic reviews for studies published since 2002. In addition, unpublished studies were located by contacting authors in the field and by online searches of dissertation databases. Thirty-eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion comprising a total of 12 829 community-based participants. A random-effects model was employed in the analysis, and effect sizes were obtained exclusively from cross-sectional data. Small to moderate effect sizes were found across four outcomes representing internalizing problems (mean corrected correlation range 0.14 to 0.26), with no significant variability across these variables. Female participants were found to score significantly higher on measures of co-rumination compared with males (d = -0.55). Moderator analyses revealed mixed findings. No significant effects were found for age, gender or publication status. A significant effect was found for co-rumination questionnaire version used (p = 0.05), and a marginal effect found for co-rumination partner (same-sex best friend versus other confidants; p = 0.08). These findings indicate that co-rumination may have a modest but significant association with internalizing problems. The implications of these findings and directions for further research are discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Co-rumination has maladaptive (repetitive, unproductive discussion of problems) components, but also shows an association with friendship satisfaction. The current review found that co-rumination has small-moderate association with depression and anxiety. Practitioners should be aware of the way in which people discuss affective distress with others.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
霹雳枕头发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
开朗千山完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
仔仔发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
袁艺珊发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
大模型应助PhDL1采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
第十一题完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
zhangyu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
CYM完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
你好发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
limbo发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
sanmu发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
斯文败类应助xu采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
默予陌完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
迅速灵寒发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
bjl发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
jxjsdlh完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
阿透发布了新的文献求助20
11秒前
ww发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
柠檬发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
虚幻穆发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
第十一题发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
爆米花应助顺利山柏采纳,获得10
12秒前
打打应助靓丽忆彤采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
Vanessa完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
动听的天晴完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6018248
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7605646
关于积分的说明 16158476
捐赠科研通 5165797
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2765030
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1746581
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635307