亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

The Relationship between Co‐rumination and Internalizing Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

沉思 心理学 荟萃分析 临床心理学 发展心理学 认知 精神科 医学 内科学
作者
Jason S. Spendelow,Laura M. Simonds,Rachel E. Avery
出处
期刊:Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy [Wiley]
卷期号:24 (2): 512-527 被引量:65
标识
DOI:10.1002/cpp.2023
摘要

Co-rumination refers to the process of engaging in repeated discussion of personal problems in dyadic relationships. The current systematic review and meta-analysis provided an evaluation of the relationship between co-rumination and internalizing problems in children, adolescents and young adults, along with an investigation of potential moderator variables. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they quantitatively assessed the relationship between co-rumination and depression, anxiety and/or internalizing problems using validated measures. An electronic search was conducted in PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane Library database of systematic reviews for studies published since 2002. In addition, unpublished studies were located by contacting authors in the field and by online searches of dissertation databases. Thirty-eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion comprising a total of 12 829 community-based participants. A random-effects model was employed in the analysis, and effect sizes were obtained exclusively from cross-sectional data. Small to moderate effect sizes were found across four outcomes representing internalizing problems (mean corrected correlation range 0.14 to 0.26), with no significant variability across these variables. Female participants were found to score significantly higher on measures of co-rumination compared with males (d = -0.55). Moderator analyses revealed mixed findings. No significant effects were found for age, gender or publication status. A significant effect was found for co-rumination questionnaire version used (p = 0.05), and a marginal effect found for co-rumination partner (same-sex best friend versus other confidants; p = 0.08). These findings indicate that co-rumination may have a modest but significant association with internalizing problems. The implications of these findings and directions for further research are discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Co-rumination has maladaptive (repetitive, unproductive discussion of problems) components, but also shows an association with friendship satisfaction. The current review found that co-rumination has small-moderate association with depression and anxiety. Practitioners should be aware of the way in which people discuss affective distress with others.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI2S应助SDNUDRUG采纳,获得10
4秒前
小王完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
充电宝应助泡面小猪采纳,获得10
54秒前
58秒前
lcs完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
xiuxiuzhang完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
呃呃诶完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
FashionBoy应助秋刀鱼不过期采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
橙花完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
lalala大鸭梨关注了科研通微信公众号
2分钟前
oleskarabach发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
包容新蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
安静的瑾瑜完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
机灵自中发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
彭于晏应助对流域采纳,获得10
3分钟前
机灵自中完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
对流域发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
秦领口发布了新的文献求助30
4分钟前
泡面小猪发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
秦领口完成签到,获得积分20
4分钟前
活力鸿发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
可久斯基完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
爆米花应助wenwen采纳,获得10
6分钟前
6分钟前
wenwen发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
6分钟前
wenwen完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
xiaolang2004完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
7分钟前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Le dégorgement réflexe des Acridiens 800
Defense against predation 800
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3137011
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2787960
关于积分的说明 7784128
捐赠科研通 2444060
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1299643
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625497
版权声明 600989