弹道
计算机科学
航空学
汽车工程
模拟
工程类
物理
天文
作者
Xintao Yan,Shuo Feng,David J. LeBlanc,Carol A. C. Flannagan,Henry Liu
出处
期刊:IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers]
日期:2024-01-01
卷期号:: 1-13
标识
DOI:10.1109/tits.2024.3397849
摘要
Real-time safety metrics are important for automated driving systems (ADS) to assess the risk of driving situations and assist in decision-making. Although a number of real-time safety metrics have been proposed in the literature, there is a lack of systematic performance evaluations of these metrics. As different behavioral assumptions are adopted in different safety metrics, it is difficult to compare the safety metrics and evaluate their performance. To overcome this challenge, in this study, we propose an evaluation framework utilizing logged vehicle trajectory data so that vehicle trajectories for both the subject vehicle (SV) and background vehicles (BVs) are obtained and the prediction errors caused by behavioral assumptions can be eliminated. Specifically, we examine whether the SV is in a collision unavoidable situation at each moment, given all near-future trajectories of BVs. In this way, we level the ground for a fair comparison of different safety metrics, as a good safety metric should always alarm in advance to the collision unavoidable moment. When trajectory data from a large number of trips are available, we can systematically evaluate and compare different metrics' statistical performance. In the case study, three representative real-time safety metrics, including the time-to-collision (TTC), the PEGASUS Criticality Metric (PCM) and the Model Predictive Instantaneous Safety Metric (MPrISM), are evaluated using a large-scale simulated trajectory dataset. The results demonstrate that the MPrISM achieves the highest recall and the PCM has the best accuracy. The proposed evaluation framework is important for researchers, practitioners, and regulators to characterize different metrics, and to select appropriate metrics for different applications. Moreover, by conducting failure analysis on moments when a safety metric fails, we can identify its potential weaknesses, which can be valuable for potential refinements and improvements.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI