Giovanni Brondani Torri,Pedro Pereira,Camila Piovesan Wiethan,Yasmin Mesquita,Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad,Patrick Veit‐Haibach,Sangeet Ghai,Ur Metser,Stephan Altmayer,Adriano Basso Dias
出处
期刊:Clinical Nuclear Medicine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)] 日期:2024-05-20卷期号:49 (8): e375-e382被引量:3
Purpose The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and the combination of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET plus MRI (PSMA + MRI) for detecting intraprostatic clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Patients and Methods Relevant databases were searched through November 2023. Only studies directly comparing mpMRI and PSMA + MRI (PET/MRI or PET/CT + mpMRI) were included. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for each approach. Results A total of 19 studies were included. On a patient-level analysis, PSMA + MRI had higher sensitivity (9 studies) than mpMRI for csPCa detection (96% [95% confidence interval (CI): 92%, 98%] vs 89% [95% CI: 81%, 94%]; P = 0.04). The patient-level specificity (4 studies) of PSMA + MRI was 55% (95% CI: 31%–76%) compared with 50% (95% CI: 44%–57%) of mpMRI ( P = 0.67). Region-level sensitivity (10 studies) was 85% (95% CI: 74%–92%) for PSMA + MRI and 71% (95% CI: 58%–82%) for mpMRI ( P = 0.09), whereas specificity (4 studies) was 87% (95% CI: 76%–94%) and 90% (95% CI: 82%–95%), respectively ( P = 0.59). Lesion-level sensitivity and specificity were similar between modalities with pooled data from less than 4 studies. Conclusions PSMA + MRI had superior pooled sensitivity and similar specificity for the detection of csPCa compared with mpMRI in this meta-analysis of head-to-head studies.