When the specter of the past haunts current groups: Psychological antecedents of historical blame.

责备 心理学 社会心理学 危害 心理信息 政治学 法学 梅德林
作者
Shree Vallabha,Jonathan E. Doriscar,Mark J. Brandt
出处
期刊:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [American Psychological Association]
标识
DOI:10.1037/pspi0000452
摘要

Groups have committed historical wrongs (e.g., genocide, slavery). We investigated why people blame current groups who were not involved in the original historical wrong for the actions of their predecessors who committed these wrongs and are no longer alive. Current models of individual and group blame overlook the dimension of time and therefore have difficulty explaining this phenomenon using their existing criteria like causality, intentionality, or preventability. We hypothesized that factors that help psychologically bridge the past and present, like perceiving higher (a) connectedness between past and present perpetrator groups, (b) continued privilege of perpetrator groups, (c) continued harm of victim groups, and (d) unfulfilled forward obligations of perpetrator groups would facilitate higher blame judgments against current groups for the past. In two repeated-measures surveys using real events (N1 = 518, N2 = 495) and two conjoint experiments using hypothetical events (N3 = 598, N4 = 605), we find correlational and causal evidence for our hypotheses. These factors link present groups to their past and cause more historical blame and support for compensation policies. This work brings the dimension of time into theories of blame, uncovers overlooked criteria for blame judgments, and questions the assumptions of existing blame models. Additionally, it helps us understand the psychological processes undergirding intergroup relations and historical narratives mired in historical conflict. Our work provides psychological insight into the debates on intergenerational justice by suggesting methods people can use to ameliorate the psychological legacies of historical wrongs and atrocities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
小二郎应助111采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
科研的牲口完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
maoamo2024发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ccc发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
秀儿完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
亚尔发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
迅速文龙发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
10秒前
10秒前
Nuyoah发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
李爱国应助迅速文龙采纳,获得10
13秒前
FashionBoy应助实验做完了吗采纳,获得30
16秒前
雨洋完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
麦田里的守望者完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
李健的小迷弟应助cloud采纳,获得10
21秒前
自由香魔完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
忘忧发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
struggling完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
NZH关闭了NZH文献求助
25秒前
27秒前
wanci应助小吴同志采纳,获得10
27秒前
shlw发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
zs发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
CipherSage应助沈胖花采纳,获得10
31秒前
情怀应助Daisy采纳,获得10
31秒前
31秒前
LZX发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
赵小漂亮发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
CC完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
estate完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
威武白桃完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
高分求助中
歯科矯正学 第7版(或第5版) 1004
SIS-ISO/IEC TS 27100:2024 Information technology — Cybersecurity — Overview and concepts (ISO/IEC TS 27100:2020, IDT)(Swedish Standard) 1000
Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential (第二版) 1000
Semiconductor Process Reliability in Practice 720
GROUP-THEORY AND POLARIZATION ALGEBRA 500
Mesopotamian divination texts : conversing with the gods : sources from the first millennium BCE 500
Days of Transition. The Parsi Death Rituals(2011) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3233116
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2879739
关于积分的说明 8212495
捐赠科研通 2547218
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1376639
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 647682
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 623073