When the specter of the past haunts current groups: Psychological antecedents of historical blame.

责备 心理学 社会心理学 危害 心理信息 政治学 法学 梅德林
作者
Shree Vallabha,Jonathan E. Doriscar,Mark J. Brandt
出处
期刊:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [American Psychological Association]
标识
DOI:10.1037/pspi0000452
摘要

Groups have committed historical wrongs (e.g., genocide, slavery). We investigated why people blame current groups who were not involved in the original historical wrong for the actions of their predecessors who committed these wrongs and are no longer alive. Current models of individual and group blame overlook the dimension of time and therefore have difficulty explaining this phenomenon using their existing criteria like causality, intentionality, or preventability. We hypothesized that factors that help psychologically bridge the past and present, like perceiving higher (a) connectedness between past and present perpetrator groups, (b) continued privilege of perpetrator groups, (c) continued harm of victim groups, and (d) unfulfilled forward obligations of perpetrator groups would facilitate higher blame judgments against current groups for the past. In two repeated-measures surveys using real events (N1 = 518, N2 = 495) and two conjoint experiments using hypothetical events (N3 = 598, N4 = 605), we find correlational and causal evidence for our hypotheses. These factors link present groups to their past and cause more historical blame and support for compensation policies. This work brings the dimension of time into theories of blame, uncovers overlooked criteria for blame judgments, and questions the assumptions of existing blame models. Additionally, it helps us understand the psychological processes undergirding intergroup relations and historical narratives mired in historical conflict. Our work provides psychological insight into the debates on intergenerational justice by suggesting methods people can use to ameliorate the psychological legacies of historical wrongs and atrocities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Paddi发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1257应助雨夜星空采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
活泼半凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
美好的若枫完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
明亮元柏发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
1257应助zsugar采纳,获得10
6秒前
JamesPei应助zsugar采纳,获得10
6秒前
Exploooosion发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
SciGPT应助hklong采纳,获得10
8秒前
Gorone发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
热心市民小红花应助chen采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
张张赶紧看文献完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
风止何安完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
Dabiel1213完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
含蓄凡柔发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
爱学习的鼠鼠完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
甜甜的安彤完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
科研通AI2S应助愉快冰淇淋采纳,获得10
14秒前
However发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
学术工人完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
顺利问玉完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
嚣张的小张完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
优秀发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
HangZ完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
咯噔发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
HangZ发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
lin应助含蓄凡柔采纳,获得10
22秒前
情怀应助俭朴的一曲采纳,获得10
23秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 2000
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 810
Pharmacogenomics: Applications to Patient Care, Third Edition 800
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3076389
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2729242
关于积分的说明 7508108
捐赠科研通 2377477
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1260632
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 611101
版权声明 597194