Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatments for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Network Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) treatment strategies have transitioned from chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy to chemo-free regimens. Frequentist network meta-analysis allows for both direct and indirect comparisons between different treatments. Methods Randomized controlled trials assessing first-line treatments were included. Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD), objective response rate, and adverse events. Studies with comparable characteristics also underwent subgroup analysis, stratifying by age, comorbidities, IGHV status, and cytogenetic abnormalities. Results 30 eligible trials involved 12,818 patients and 30 treatments were included. Acalabrutinib demonstrated a PFS advantage over ibrutinib and obinutuzumab-venetoclax (OV) in patients over 65 years old or with unmutated IGHV. In younger patients with comorbidities, Acalabrutinib-Obinutuzumab (AO) had superior PFS compared to Ibrutinib-Obinutuzumab (IO), Ibrutinib-Venetoclax (IV), and OV. For older patients with comorbidities, Acalabrutinib and AO both outperformed OV without significant difference between them. MRD-guided IV surpassed OV in patients without comorbidities. IO exhibited extended PFS benefits compared to OV in patients with mutated IGHV or with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations. IV and IO have lower neutropenia rates than OV. IV have fewer infections than Acalabrutinib and AO. AO causes less diarrhea than IV but more headaches than IO and OV. OV has lower hypertension rates than IO. IV has fewer arthralgia than AO. For any grade secondary primary neoplasms, IV and OV is less than AO. Conclusion Tailored chemo-free regimens can be selected based on age, comorbidities, IGHV status, and cytogenetic abnormalities to optimize treatment outcomes while considering different response spectra.