医学
乳腺摄影术
乳腺癌
对比度(视觉)
诊断准确性
乳腺癌筛查
妇科
癌症
放射科
产科
内科学
人工智能
计算机科学
作者
Noam Nissan,Christopher Comstock,Varadan Sevilimedu,Jill S. Gluskin,Victoria L. Mango,Mary Hughes,R. Elena Ochoa‐Albiztegui,Janice S. Sung,Maxine S. Jochelson,Shannyn Wolfe
出处
期刊:Radiology
[Radiological Society of North America]
日期:2024-10-01
卷期号:313 (1)
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.232580
摘要
Background Mammogram interpretation is challenging in female patients with extremely dense breasts (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category D), who have a higher breast cancer risk. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has recently emerged as a potential alternative; however, data regarding CEM utility in this subpopulation are limited. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEM for breast cancer screening in female patients with extremely dense breasts. Materials and Methods This retrospective single-institution study included consecutive CEM examinations in asymptomatic female patients with extremely dense breasts performed from December 2012 to March 2022. From CEM examinations, low-energy (LE) images were the equivalent of a two-dimensional full-field digital mammogram. Recombined images highlighting areas of contrast enhancement were constructed using a postprocessing algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of LE images and CEM images (ie, including both LE and recombined images) were calculated and compared using the McNemar test. Results This study included 1299 screening CEM examinations (609 female patients; mean age, 50 years ± 9 [SD]). Sixteen screen-detected cancers were diagnosed, and two interval cancers occured. Five cancers were depicted at LE imaging and an additional 11 cancers were depicted at CEM (incremental cancer detection rate, 8.7 cancers per 1000 examinations). CEM sensitivity was 88.9% (16 of 18; 95% CI: 65.3, 98.6), which was higher than the LE examination sensitivity of 27.8% (five of 18; 95% CI: 9.7, 53.5) (
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI