Why do guidelines recommend screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, but not for asymptomatic carotid stenosis? A plea for a randomized controlled trial

医学 无症状的 恳求 狭窄 随机对照试验 腹主动脉瘤 心脏病学 放射科 外科 动脉瘤 政治学 法学
作者
Kosmas I. Paraskevas,J. David Spence,Dimitri P. Mikhailidis,Pier Luigi Antignani,Péter Gloviczki,Hans‐Henning Eckstein,Francesco Spinelli,Francesco Stilo,Luca Saba,Pavel Poredoš,Alan Dardik,Christos D. Liapis,Armando Mansilha,Gianluca Faggioli,Rodolfo Pini,Mateja K. Ježovnik,Sherif Sultan,Piotr Musiałek,Guillaume Goudot,George S. Lavenson,Arkadiusz Jawień,Aleš Blinc,Piotr Myrcha,José Fernandes e Fernandes,George Geroulakos,Stavros K. Kakkos,Michael Knoflach,Robert M. Proczka,Laura Capoccia,Tatjana Rundek,Alexei Svetlikov,Mauro Silvestrini,Jean‐Baptiste Ricco,Alun H. Davies,Vincenzo Di Lazzaro,Jasjit S. Suri,Gaetano Antonio Lanza,Gustav Fraedrich,Clark J. Zeebregts,Andrew Nicolaides
出处
期刊:International Journal of Cardiology [Elsevier]
卷期号:371: 406-412 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.045
摘要

Background Current guidelines do not recommend screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS). The rationale behind this recommendation is that detection of AsxCS may lead to an unnecessary carotid intervention. In contrast, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms is strongly recommended. Methods A critical analysis of the literature was performed to evaluate the implications of detecting AsxCS. Results Patients with AsxCS are at high risk for future stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death. Population-wide screening for AsxCS should not be recommended. Additionally, screening of high-risk individuals for AsxCS with the purpose of identifying candidates for a carotid intervention is inappropriate. Instead, selective screening for AsxCS should be considered and should be viewed as an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and future cardiovascular events for the timely initiation of intensive medical therapy and risk factor modification. Conclusions Although mass screening should not be recommended, there are several arguments suggesting that selective screening for AsxCS should be considered. The rationale supporting such selective screening is to optimize risk factor control and to initiate intensive medical therapy for prevention of future cardiovascular events, rather than to identify candidates for an intervention.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
酷波er应助浮浮世世采纳,获得10
1秒前
只要你乖发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
小太阳完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
亗sui发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
wu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
道格拉斯的小妖完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
东门吹雪发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
小二郎应助不安时光采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
lily完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
恋晨完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
完美世界应助西蘑菇采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
xzh完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
英姑应助ddd采纳,获得10
6秒前
圈圈发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
baishao发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助桔子采纳,获得10
7秒前
lrll发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
一坨耙耙完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
迷失浪人发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
馒头完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
李爱国应助整齐的寄云采纳,获得10
8秒前
什米发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Ava应助lnzdf采纳,获得10
8秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
温柔映阳发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
可爱的函函应助我是微风采纳,获得10
10秒前
小朱佩奇发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
wu完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
你好你好完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
Superabsorbent Polymers 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5707949
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5186552
关于积分的说明 15252222
捐赠科研通 4861091
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2609200
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1559900
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1517670