Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population

医学 慢性阻塞性肺病 肺活量测定 接收机工作特性 恶化 人口 置信区间 内科学 物理疗法 阻塞性肺病 哮喘 环境卫生
作者
Jiawei Zhou,Na Yu,Xiaomeng Li,Wei Wang
出处
期刊:International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [Dove Medical Press]
卷期号:Volume 17: 317-327 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.2147/copd.s341648
摘要

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is under diagnosis in China. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of six COPD screening questionnaires for the early detection of COPD.We recruited patients aged ≥35 years, presenting at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in 2021. All participants completed the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), Revised COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (Revised-CDQ), COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS), COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE), and Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ). The patients underwent spirometry testing with further bronchodilator testing for those with FEV1/FVC values of <0.70. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were drawn for each questionnaire. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV), negative predictive (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) values of the optimal cut-off and previously reported scores were estimated and compared.Of 909 patients who completed the six screening questionnaires and spirometry testing, 330 patients were newly diagnosed with COPD. AUC values for the LFQ, Revised CDQ, COPD-PS, CDQ, COPD-SQ, and CAPTURE were 0.785 (95% confidence interval: 0.752-0.812), 0.762 (0.727-0.795), 0.745 (0.707-0.778), 0.731 (0.695-0.762), 0.703 (0.671-0.734), and 0.667 (0.635-0.702), respectively. The optimal cut-off scores for CDQ, Revised-CDQ, COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, CAPTURE, and LFQ were: 19, 19, 5, 17, 3, and 16 points, respectively. Compared with the previously recommended values, the present cut-off values for the CAPTURE and LFQ had better screening accuracy. The LFQ performed better than the CDQ, COPD-SQ, or CAPTURE. The Revised CDQ performed better than CAPTURE or COPD-SQ. The COPD-PS performed better than CAPTURE.All six questionnaires can discriminate between subjects with or without COPD. The LFQ performed particularly well. The CAPTURE and LFQ scores of 3 and 16 have better screening accuracy than the scores previously reported.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
粗犷的若灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
赘婿应助Zz采纳,获得10
1秒前
蜗牛发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
李根苗完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
冷静冰棍关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
哭泣乌发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
Akim应助听话的寒烟采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
谢某某102097完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
精明悲发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
sun完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
乐乐应助阿肃采纳,获得10
7秒前
大西瓜发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
YH完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
ting完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
十七发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
哇哈发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
SciGPT应助邓敬燃采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
桐桐应助lucky采纳,获得30
10秒前
wanci应助快乐帽子采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI6.1应助李一菲采纳,获得10
11秒前
sun发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
ZPS发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
系统提示发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Labman完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
mao发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
在水一方应助圆圆大王采纳,获得10
13秒前
大秦骑兵完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Akim应助spotlight采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
Orange应助景从云采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 9th Edition 500
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6048799
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7833825
关于积分的说明 16260792
捐赠科研通 5194044
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2779244
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1762491
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1644666