Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population

医学 慢性阻塞性肺病 肺活量测定 接收机工作特性 恶化 人口 置信区间 内科学 物理疗法 阻塞性肺病 哮喘 环境卫生
作者
Jiawei Zhou,Na Yu,Xiaomeng Li,Wei Wang
出处
期刊:International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [Dove Medical Press]
卷期号:Volume 17: 317-327 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.2147/copd.s341648
摘要

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is under diagnosis in China. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of six COPD screening questionnaires for the early detection of COPD.We recruited patients aged ≥35 years, presenting at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in 2021. All participants completed the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), Revised COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (Revised-CDQ), COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS), COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE), and Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ). The patients underwent spirometry testing with further bronchodilator testing for those with FEV1/FVC values of <0.70. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were drawn for each questionnaire. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV), negative predictive (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) values of the optimal cut-off and previously reported scores were estimated and compared.Of 909 patients who completed the six screening questionnaires and spirometry testing, 330 patients were newly diagnosed with COPD. AUC values for the LFQ, Revised CDQ, COPD-PS, CDQ, COPD-SQ, and CAPTURE were 0.785 (95% confidence interval: 0.752-0.812), 0.762 (0.727-0.795), 0.745 (0.707-0.778), 0.731 (0.695-0.762), 0.703 (0.671-0.734), and 0.667 (0.635-0.702), respectively. The optimal cut-off scores for CDQ, Revised-CDQ, COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, CAPTURE, and LFQ were: 19, 19, 5, 17, 3, and 16 points, respectively. Compared with the previously recommended values, the present cut-off values for the CAPTURE and LFQ had better screening accuracy. The LFQ performed better than the CDQ, COPD-SQ, or CAPTURE. The Revised CDQ performed better than CAPTURE or COPD-SQ. The COPD-PS performed better than CAPTURE.All six questionnaires can discriminate between subjects with or without COPD. The LFQ performed particularly well. The CAPTURE and LFQ scores of 3 and 16 have better screening accuracy than the scores previously reported.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
平淡如豹发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
andrele应助Curtley采纳,获得10
刚刚
唠叨的曼易完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
jackmilton发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
流云完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI6应助apt采纳,获得10
1秒前
杜瑞豪发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
香蕉觅云应助田田田田采纳,获得50
2秒前
hhy发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
Lumos完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
青炀完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
土豆完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
赘婿应助外向依白采纳,获得10
5秒前
完美世界应助研友_nVWP2Z采纳,获得10
5秒前
Amber完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
Hello应助可爱的冷霜采纳,获得10
5秒前
JQKing完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
FrozNineTivus发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
吕曼完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
爱笑的沛柔关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
无助的考拉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
小马完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
kelly完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
敢敢完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
一氧化碳完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
humble完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
徐文楚关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
于123456789完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
CSR完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
地平完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
chloe完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
tttck完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
HAHNNNNNNN发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 340
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5257760
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4419814
关于积分的说明 13757826
捐赠科研通 4293273
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2355850
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1352298
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1313061