亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression

医学 疫苗效力 观察研究 接种疫苗 荟萃分析 心理干预 系统回顾 临床试验 随机对照试验 致盲 梅德林 内科学 免疫学 政治学 精神科 法学
作者
Daniel R Feikin,Melissa M Higdon,Laith J Abu-Raddad,Nick Andrews,Rafael Araos,Yair Goldberg,Michelle J Groome,Amit Huppert,Katherine L O'Brien,Peter G Smith,Annelies Wilder-Smith,Scott Zeger,Maria Deloria Knoll,Minal K Patel
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:399 (10328): 924-944 被引量:237
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00152-0
摘要

Knowing whether COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness wanes is crucial for informing vaccine policy, such as the need for and timing of booster doses. We aimed to systematically review the evidence for the duration of protection of COVID-19 vaccines against various clinical outcomes, and to assess changes in the rates of breakthrough infection caused by the delta variant with increasing time since vaccination.This study was designed as a systematic review and meta-regression. We did a systematic review of preprint and peer-reviewed published article databases from June 17, 2021, to Dec 2, 2021. Randomised controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and observational studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness were eligible. Studies with vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates at discrete time intervals of people who had received full vaccination and that met predefined screening criteria underwent full-text review. We used random-effects meta-regression to estimate the average change in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness 1-6 months after full vaccination.Of 13 744 studies screened, 310 underwent full-text review, and 18 studies were included (all studies were carried out before the omicron variant began to circulate widely). Risk of bias, established using the risk of bias 2 tool for randomised controlled trials or the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool was low for three studies, moderate for eight studies, and serious for seven studies. We included 78 vaccine-specific vaccine efficacy or effectiveness evaluations (Pfizer-BioNTech-Comirnaty, n=38; Moderna-mRNA-1273, n=23; Janssen-Ad26.COV2.S, n=9; and AstraZeneca-Vaxzevria, n=8). On average, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection decreased from 1 month to 6 months after full vaccination by 21·0 percentage points (95% CI 13·9-29·8) among people of all ages and 20·7 percentage points (10·2-36·6) among older people (as defined by each study, who were at least 50 years old). For symptomatic COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 24·9 percentage points (95% CI 13·4-41·6) in people of all ages and 32·0 percentage points (11·0-69·0) in older people. For severe COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 10·0 percentage points (95% CI 6·1-15·4) in people of all ages and 9·5 percentage points (5·7-14·6) in older people. Most (81%) vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates against severe disease remained greater than 70% over time.COVID-19 vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against severe disease remained high, although it did decrease somewhat by 6 months after full vaccination. By contrast, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against infection and symptomatic disease decreased approximately 20-30 percentage points by 6 months. The decrease in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness is likely caused by, at least in part, waning immunity, although an effect of bias cannot be ruled out. Evaluating vaccine efficacy or effectiveness beyond 6 months will be crucial for updating COVID-19 vaccine policy.Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
我是老大应助tfop采纳,获得10
35秒前
41秒前
46秒前
tfop发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
Layover完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
arizaki7发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
烟花应助arizaki7采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.3应助tfop采纳,获得10
2分钟前
arizaki7完成签到,获得积分20
2分钟前
2分钟前
tfop发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
充电宝应助tfop采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
tfop发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
Zhou发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
靤君发布了新的文献求助30
4分钟前
情怀应助Zhou采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
Nina完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
靤君发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
5分钟前
小熊天天学习完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
LX有理想完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
Zhou发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
我是老大应助Zhou采纳,获得10
5分钟前
6分钟前
ZYD完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
Zhou完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
Zhou发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
香蕉觅云应助泊岸采纳,获得10
6分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6444446
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8258350
关于积分的说明 17591080
捐赠科研通 5503640
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2901372
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1878421
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1717736