Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression

医学 疫苗效力 观察研究 接种疫苗 荟萃分析 心理干预 系统回顾 临床试验 随机对照试验 致盲 梅德林 内科学 免疫学 政治学 精神科 法学
作者
Daniel R Feikin,Melissa M Higdon,Laith J Abu-Raddad,Nick Andrews,Rafael Araos,Yair Goldberg,Michelle J Groome,Amit Huppert,Katherine L O'Brien,Peter G Smith,Annelies Wilder-Smith,Scott Zeger,Maria Deloria Knoll,Minal K Patel
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier]
卷期号:399 (10328): 924-944 被引量:237
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00152-0
摘要

Knowing whether COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness wanes is crucial for informing vaccine policy, such as the need for and timing of booster doses. We aimed to systematically review the evidence for the duration of protection of COVID-19 vaccines against various clinical outcomes, and to assess changes in the rates of breakthrough infection caused by the delta variant with increasing time since vaccination.This study was designed as a systematic review and meta-regression. We did a systematic review of preprint and peer-reviewed published article databases from June 17, 2021, to Dec 2, 2021. Randomised controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and observational studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness were eligible. Studies with vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates at discrete time intervals of people who had received full vaccination and that met predefined screening criteria underwent full-text review. We used random-effects meta-regression to estimate the average change in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness 1-6 months after full vaccination.Of 13 744 studies screened, 310 underwent full-text review, and 18 studies were included (all studies were carried out before the omicron variant began to circulate widely). Risk of bias, established using the risk of bias 2 tool for randomised controlled trials or the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool was low for three studies, moderate for eight studies, and serious for seven studies. We included 78 vaccine-specific vaccine efficacy or effectiveness evaluations (Pfizer-BioNTech-Comirnaty, n=38; Moderna-mRNA-1273, n=23; Janssen-Ad26.COV2.S, n=9; and AstraZeneca-Vaxzevria, n=8). On average, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection decreased from 1 month to 6 months after full vaccination by 21·0 percentage points (95% CI 13·9-29·8) among people of all ages and 20·7 percentage points (10·2-36·6) among older people (as defined by each study, who were at least 50 years old). For symptomatic COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 24·9 percentage points (95% CI 13·4-41·6) in people of all ages and 32·0 percentage points (11·0-69·0) in older people. For severe COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 10·0 percentage points (95% CI 6·1-15·4) in people of all ages and 9·5 percentage points (5·7-14·6) in older people. Most (81%) vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates against severe disease remained greater than 70% over time.COVID-19 vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against severe disease remained high, although it did decrease somewhat by 6 months after full vaccination. By contrast, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against infection and symptomatic disease decreased approximately 20-30 percentage points by 6 months. The decrease in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness is likely caused by, at least in part, waning immunity, although an effect of bias cannot be ruled out. Evaluating vaccine efficacy or effectiveness beyond 6 months will be crucial for updating COVID-19 vaccine policy.Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
吴文章完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
万能图书馆应助lemon采纳,获得10
1秒前
米茜完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
ye完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
qipupu222完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
包容的琦完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
XXHH发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
芙芙官应助90采纳,获得30
5秒前
打打应助孝顺的青筠采纳,获得10
5秒前
可爱紫发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
明朗发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
gaogao完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Clovis33发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI5应助前前前世采纳,获得10
7秒前
健壮橘子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
TT完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
丘比特应助畅快芝麻采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
小马甲应助zy采纳,获得10
9秒前
单纯飞莲完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
大牛牛完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
lemon完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
乐乐应助我爱科研采纳,获得30
11秒前
打打应助健壮橘子采纳,获得10
11秒前
zcj驳回了汉堡包应助
12秒前
12秒前
俏皮丹雪给俏皮丹雪的求助进行了留言
12秒前
13秒前
xiaoka发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
李健应助一瓶采纳,获得10
15秒前
stargazor发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
科研通AI5应助方明会采纳,获得10
16秒前
jiajin完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Luis Lacasa - Sobre esto y aquello 700
Novel synthetic routes for multiple bond formation between Si, Ge, and Sn and the d- and p-block elements 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3524730
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3105601
关于积分的说明 9275012
捐赠科研通 2802788
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1538175
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716104
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709191