热失控
易燃液体
核工程
爆炸物
燃烧
超压
电池(电)
环境科学
废物管理
化学
工程类
热力学
物理
功率(物理)
有机化学
作者
Huaibin Wang,Hui Xu,Zelin Zhang,Qinzheng Wang,Changyong Jin,Changjun Wu,Chengshan Xu,Jinyuan Hao,Lei Sun,Zhiming Du,Yang Li,Junli Sun,Xuning Feng
出处
期刊:eTransportation
[Elsevier]
日期:2022-06-16
卷期号:13: 100190-100190
被引量:112
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.etran.2022.100190
摘要
The combustion and explosion of the vent gas from battery failure cause catastrophe for electrochemical energy storage systems. Fire extinguishing and explosion proof countermeasures therefore require rational dispose of the flammable and explosive vent gas emitted from battery thermal runaway. However, the fire and explosion nature of the multiphase vent gas remains unclear. This paper comparatively investigates the fire and explosion hazards of the vent gas emitted by different kinds of lithium-ion batteries after thermal runaway. Hazard data are collected for batteries with cathode LiNixCoyMnzO2 (x from 0.33 to 0.8) and LiFePO4, which are prevailingly used or to be used in energy storage scenarios. The composition and content of the vent gas were analyzed using a pressurized container and gas chromatography. A 1-liter explosion sphere was used to determine the explosion limits, explosion pressure, and maximum rise rate of explosion pressure for five cell chemistries at 298 K and 101 kPa absolute pressure. The laminar burning velocities of the five vent gases were measured by Bunsen burner. The minimum concentration of fire extinguishing agent was tested using a cup burner. The results show that the fire and explosion hazards posed by the vent gas from LiFePO4 battery are greater than those from Li(NixCoyMn1-x-y)O2 battery, which counters common sense and sets reminders for designing electric energy storage stations. We may need reconsider the choice of cell chemistries for electrical energy storage systems, and care more about the safety design against the fire and explosion disaster that may occur at system level. The explosion characteristics of the vent gases from five cell chemistries and the minimum fire extinguishing concentration can enlighten future risk assessments of electrochemical energy storage systems.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI