摘要
Viral genomics has become crucial in clinical diagnostics and ecology, not to mention to stem the COVID-19 pandemic. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is pivotal in gaining an improved understanding of viral evolution, genomic epidemiology, infectious outbreaks, pathobiology, clinical management, and vaccine development. Genome assembly is one of the crucial steps in WGS data analyses. A series of different assemblers has been developed with the advent of high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS). Various studies have reported the evaluation of these assembly tools on distinct datasets; however, these lack data from viral origin. In this study, we performed a comparative evaluation and benchmarking of eight de novo assemblers: SOAPdenovo, Velvet, assembly by short sequences (ABySS), iterative De Bruijn graph assembler (IDBA), SPAdes, Edena, iterative virus assembler, and VICUNA on the viral NGS data from distinct Illumina (GAIIx, Hiseq, Miseq, and Nextseq) platforms. WGS data of diverse viruses, that is, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), dengue virus 3, human immunodeficiency virus 1, hepatitis B virus, human herpesvirus 8, human papillomavirus 16, rhinovirus A, and West Nile virus, were utilized to assess these assemblers. Performance metrics such as genome fraction recovery, assembly lengths, NG50, N50, contig length, contig numbers, mismatches, and misassemblies were analyzed. Overall, three assemblers, that is, SPAdes, IDBA, and ABySS, performed consistently well, including for genome assembly of SARS-CoV-2. These assembly methods should be considered and recommended for future studies of viruses. The study also suggests that implementing two or more assembly approaches should be considered in viral NGS studies, especially in clinical settings. Taken together, the benchmarking of eight de novo genome assemblers reported in this study can inform future public health and ecology research concerning the viruses, the COVID-19 pandemic, and viral outbreaks.