Preservice Teachers’ Abilities and Confidence with Constructing Scientific Explanations as Scaffolds are Faded in a Physics Course for Educators

构造(python库) 数学教育 科学教育 干预(咨询) 心理学 科学推理 计算机科学 精神科 程序设计语言
作者
Heidi Masters,Jennifer L. Docktor
出处
期刊:Journal of Science Teacher Education [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:33 (7): 786-813 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1080/1046560x.2021.2004641
摘要

A mixed-methods, quasi-experimental design was employed to explore how the Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning (CER) framework along with written, verbal, and peer scaffolds would influence early childhood/elementary and elementary/middle childhood preservice teachers' (PSTs) abilities to formulate scientific explanations within a physical science course for educators. Two sections served as the intervention group and learned how to construct scientific explanations with the supports described above. Two additional sections served as the comparison group and received no additional support for how to construct explanations in science. Five pre/post scientific explanations, five scientific explanation quiz questions, five scientific explanation journal entries, and five self-reflections were collected and analyzed to address the research questions. From our results, we can conclude that the CER framework along with the fading of scaffolds can assist PSTs with learning how to construct scientific explanations. There was a statistically significant difference between the intervention and the comparison groups' abilities to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim and justify their claim and evidence with scientific reasoning across all data sources. The results also show the intervention groups' ability to form a scientific explanation was not influenced by the fading of the scaffolds; rather certain content areas were more challenging than others. Providing evidence that required mathematical and computational thinking was more challenging for both groups. Reasoning continued to be the most difficult component of an explanation for PSTs to construct. These findings have important implications for the design of science content courses for PSTs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
改论文不看剧应助竼竼采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
无骨鸡爪不长胖完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
轩墨完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
英俊的铭应助an采纳,获得10
3秒前
橘橙色发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
半糖发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小白菜发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
周周发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
汉堡包应助王柯采纳,获得10
11秒前
轩墨发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
爆米花应助半糖采纳,获得10
12秒前
英姑应助孙成成采纳,获得10
12秒前
14秒前
小白菜完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
领导范儿应助nimo采纳,获得10
17秒前
英俊的铭应助nimo采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
南区食堂不好吃完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
妄自完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
SciGPT应助曦小蕊采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
哆啦A梦的小小王完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
热心易绿完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
qi0625完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
至幸发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
Wait发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
大胆问丝完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
28秒前
科研通AI2S应助端庄的学姐采纳,获得10
29秒前
29秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
ACE发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
33秒前
澡雪发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
Wait完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3975516
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3519930
关于积分的说明 11200130
捐赠科研通 3256278
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798183
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877425
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806320