Dialysis Modality Preference of Patients With CKD and Family Caregivers: A Discrete-Choice Study

医学 透析 家庭血液透析 肾脏疾病 血液透析 腹膜透析 内科学 肾功能 重症监护医学 儿科
作者
Rachael L. Morton,Paul Snelling,Angela C Webster,John M. Rose,Rosemary Masterson,David W. Johnson,Kirsten Howard
出处
期刊:American Journal of Kidney Diseases [Elsevier]
卷期号:60 (1): 102-111 被引量:112
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.030
摘要

Background Dialysis modality preferences of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and family caregivers are important, yet rarely quantified. Study Design Prospective, unlabeled, discrete-choice experiment with random-parameter logit analysis. Setting & Participants Adults with stages 3-5 CKD and caregivers educated about dialysis treatment options from 8 Australian renal clinics. Predictors Preferences for and trade-offs between the dialysis treatment attributes of life expectancy, number of hospital visits per week, ability to travel, hours per treatment, treatment time of day, subsidized transport service, and flexibility of treatment schedule. Outcomes & Measurements Results presented as ORs for preferring home-based or in-center dialysis to conservative care. Results 105 predialysis patients and 73 family caregivers completed the study. Median patient age was 63 years, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 18.1 (range, 6-34) mL/min/1.73 m2. Median caregiver age was 61 years. Home-based dialysis (either peritoneal or home hemodialysis) was chosen by patients in 65% of choice sets; in-center dialysis, in 35%; and conservative care, in 10%. For caregivers, this was 72%, 25%, and 3%, respectively. Both patients and caregivers preferred longer rather than shorter hours of dialysis (ORs of 2.02 [95% CI, 1.51-2.70] and 2.67 [95% CI, 1.85-3.85] for patients and caregivers, respectively), but were less likely to choose nocturnal than daytime dialysis (ORs of 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.75] and 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.20]). Patients were willing to forgo 23 (95% CI, 19-27) months of life expectancy with home-based dialysis to decrease their travel restrictions. For caregivers, this was 17 (95% CI, 16-18) patient-months. Limitations Data were limited to stated preferences rather than actual choice of dialysis modality. Conclusions Our study suggests that it is rare for caregivers to prefer conservative nondialytic care for family members with CKD. Home-based dialysis modalities that enable patients and their family members to travel with minimal restriction would be strongly aligned with the preferences of both parties. Dialysis modality preferences of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and family caregivers are important, yet rarely quantified. Prospective, unlabeled, discrete-choice experiment with random-parameter logit analysis. Adults with stages 3-5 CKD and caregivers educated about dialysis treatment options from 8 Australian renal clinics. Preferences for and trade-offs between the dialysis treatment attributes of life expectancy, number of hospital visits per week, ability to travel, hours per treatment, treatment time of day, subsidized transport service, and flexibility of treatment schedule. Results presented as ORs for preferring home-based or in-center dialysis to conservative care. 105 predialysis patients and 73 family caregivers completed the study. Median patient age was 63 years, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 18.1 (range, 6-34) mL/min/1.73 m2. Median caregiver age was 61 years. Home-based dialysis (either peritoneal or home hemodialysis) was chosen by patients in 65% of choice sets; in-center dialysis, in 35%; and conservative care, in 10%. For caregivers, this was 72%, 25%, and 3%, respectively. Both patients and caregivers preferred longer rather than shorter hours of dialysis (ORs of 2.02 [95% CI, 1.51-2.70] and 2.67 [95% CI, 1.85-3.85] for patients and caregivers, respectively), but were less likely to choose nocturnal than daytime dialysis (ORs of 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.75] and 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.20]). Patients were willing to forgo 23 (95% CI, 19-27) months of life expectancy with home-based dialysis to decrease their travel restrictions. For caregivers, this was 17 (95% CI, 16-18) patient-months. Data were limited to stated preferences rather than actual choice of dialysis modality. Our study suggests that it is rare for caregivers to prefer conservative nondialytic care for family members with CKD. Home-based dialysis modalities that enable patients and their family members to travel with minimal restriction would be strongly aligned with the preferences of both parties.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
脱羰甲酸完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小韩同学完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
西西完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
等等完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
一裤子灰完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
社牛小柯完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
欢呼的世立完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
陈总完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
舒心凡应助Ginny采纳,获得30
5秒前
上官若男应助vivi采纳,获得10
6秒前
zhy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
Breeze完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
bear发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
aaa发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
紫金之恋完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
奋斗的醉柳完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
无花果应助大热热采纳,获得10
13秒前
Sylvia完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
好好学习完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
bear完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
妙木仙发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Frank应助hajimi采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
乐空思应助gloval采纳,获得10
19秒前
诚心的松思完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
vivi发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
庾楼月宛如昨完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
默默友儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
巧克力完成签到 ,获得积分0
23秒前
aaa完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
团子团子猪完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
Peptide Synthesis_Methods and Protocols 400
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5603579
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4688574
关于积分的说明 14854759
捐赠科研通 4693983
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2540888
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1507108
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1471806