刚度
外固定
材料科学
固定(群体遗传学)
物理
生物医学工程
结构工程
口腔正畸科
复合材料
工程类
医学
外固定器
环境卫生
人口
作者
Craig S. Roberts,Valentin Antoci,Valentin Antoci,Michael J. Voor
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2004.08.018
摘要
To analyse the effect of transfixion wire-crossing angle on the stiffness of fine wire external fixation, a laboratory investigation using a fibreglass tibia fixed into an idealised fixator was performed with a servohydraulic test frame. Load–deformation behaviour was compared at the different wire-crossing angles (30°–90°) under identical conditions of central axial compression, medial compression-bending, posterior compression-bending, posteromedial compression-bending, and torsion. Stiffness values were calculated from the load–deformation and torque–angle curves. The increase in wire-crossing angle led to an overall increase in the stiffness, except medial bending stiffness. The wire-crossing angle of 90° provided significantly greater stiffness than all other angles in all load configurations (p < 0.05) except medial bending. In medial bending, the wire-crossing angle of 30° provided significantly greater stiffness than all the other angles (p < 0.05). Increasing wire-crossing angle from 30° to 90° contributed to an overall increase of 75% in external fixation stiffness, which included axial, torsional, and bending stiffness, but bending stiffness was a function of the wire positioning with respect to the loading axis. Therefore, using the widest possible wire-crossing angle and placing wires as close to the loading plane as possible can increase the stiffness of external fixation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI