已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Switching the Antidepressant After Nonresponse in Adults With Major Depression

抗抑郁药 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 萧条(经济学) 医学 数据提取 重性抑郁障碍 严格标准化平均差 内科学 继续 精神科 心理学 梅德林 心理信息 焦虑 认知 宏观经济学 经济 程序设计语言 法学 计算机科学 政治学
作者
Tom Bschor,Hannah Kern,Jonathan Henssler,Christopher Baethge
出处
期刊:The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry [Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.]
卷期号:79 (1): 11-18 被引量:66
标识
DOI:10.4088/jcp.16r10749
摘要

Article Abstract Objective: Nonresponders to antidepressant monotherapy during acute treatment of major depression are often switched to a new antidepressant. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of switching to a new antidepressant with continuation of the first antidepressant. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases and additional sources were systematically searched independently by 2 authors up to March 2015 without language limitations. With employment of a sensitivity-enhancing search strategy, generic terms for major depression, switching, and randomized trials were combined. Study Selection: Articles (3,234) were screened for trials of patients with major depression who had not responded to antidepressant monotherapy who were then randomized either to a new antidepressant or to continuation of the first antidepressant. Studies were subdivided into those not allowing for dose escalation in the continuation arm (strict analysis) and those allowing for dose escalation (broad analysis). Data Extraction: Data were extracted and risk of bias was assessed independently by 2 authors, and data were pooled using random effects models. Results: Four randomized controlled trials were included in the strict analysis and 8 in the broad analysis. In both analyses, switching was not superior to continuation: the standardized mean difference in the strict analysis was −0.17 (95% CI, −0.59 to 0.26; P = .45; I2 = 77.8%) and in the broad analysis was 0.031 (95% CI, −0.26 to 0.32; P = .836; I2 = 85.3%). All secondary outcome analyses (response and remission rates, low risk of bias studies only, leave-one-out analysis, dropouts) supported the results. There was no indication of publication bias. Conclusions: There is a dearth of randomized controlled trials investigating switching. There is no high-level evidence that switching the antidepressant is effective when compared to simply continuing the initial antidepressant. Since there are better treatment options than switching, physicians should be cautious to switch antidepressants.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
桃桃完成签到 ,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
洁净的盼烟应助NI伦Ge采纳,获得10
5秒前
拴Q完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
8秒前
坚定的短靴完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
10秒前
11秒前
neocc123完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
Henry给iNk的求助进行了留言
16秒前
wyf发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
冷静映安完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
蒲sir发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
能干的元龙完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
想睡觉的小笼包完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
28秒前
30秒前
31秒前
34秒前
第五元素完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
852应助Maestro_S采纳,获得10
39秒前
39秒前
GYH发布了新的文献求助30
44秒前
h0jian09完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
平底锅攻击完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
善学以致用应助Cwx2020采纳,获得10
46秒前
冷酷函完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
50秒前
娜写年华完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
共享精神应助liyang999采纳,获得10
52秒前
56秒前
单纯芹菜完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
躺平摆烂小饼干完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Cwx2020发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
我的苞娜公主完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
田様应助故城采纳,获得10
1分钟前
everglow发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Le dégorgement réflexe des Acridiens 800
Defense against predation 800
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3136896
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2787866
关于积分的说明 7783548
捐赠科研通 2443945
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1299509
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625461
版权声明 600954