Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis

角膜磨镶术 激光手术 医学 光折变性角膜切除术 眼科 荟萃分析 激光矫视 视力 小切口晶状体摘除术 随机对照试验 折射误差 角膜 外科 内科学
作者
Daizong Wen,Colm McAlinden,Ian Flitcroft,Ruixue Tu,Qinmei Wang,Jorge L. Alió,John Marshall,Yingying Huang,Benhao Song,Liang Hu,Yun‐e Zhao,Senmiao Zhu,Rongrong Gao,Fangjun Bao,A‐Yong Yu,Yu Ye,Hengli Lian,Jinhai Huang
出处
期刊:American Journal of Ophthalmology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:178: 65-78 被引量:123
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.013
摘要

To compare the postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of all major forms of laser corneal refractive surgeries for correcting myopia.Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the US trial registry was conducted up to November 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting in accordance with the eligibility criteria were included in this review. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.Forty-eight RCTs were identified. For efficacy (uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA]), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) ranking (from best to worst) was femtosecond-based laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), LASIK, small-incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), epipolis (Epi)-LASIK, transepithelial PRK (T-PRK). For predictability (refractive spherical equivalent [SE]), a statistically significant difference was found when FS-LASIK was compared with LASIK (odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.20-4.14), PRK (OR 2.16, 95% CrI 1.15-4.03), LASEK (OR 2.09, 95% CrI 1.08-4.55), and Epi-LASIK (OR 2.74, 95% CrI 1.11-6.20). The SUCRA ranking (from best to worst) was FS-LASIK, T-PRK, LASEK, PRK, LASIK, Epi-LASIK. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) comparisons. For both postoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA ranking results show that some corneal surface ablation techniques (PRK and LASEK) rank highest.This network meta-analysis shows that there were no statistically significant differences in either visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (HOAs and CS). FS-LASIK behaved better in predictability than any other type of surgeries.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1234567完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小林是我发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
吴DrYDYY发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
CodeCraft应助冉冉采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
大模型应助爱撒娇的从丹采纳,获得10
3秒前
Mine_cherry给风语过的求助进行了留言
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
xxxdie发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
自觉思萱发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
精灵梦完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
周小周完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
小蘑菇应助哎呀呀采纳,获得10
9秒前
熊啾啾发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
Orange应助靓丽幻梅采纳,获得10
11秒前
长情蜜蜂关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
12秒前
曾经的听枫完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
周小周发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
oy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Sky完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
冰糖葫芦娃关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
rr发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
王琳霞发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Selene完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
qigu完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
mengwenkun发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
轩辕寄风完成签到,获得积分0
15秒前
科目三应助粗心的蜜蜂采纳,获得10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 1500
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
Rheumatoid arthritis drugs market analysis North America, Europe, Asia, Rest of world (ROW)-US, UK, Germany, France, China-size and Forecast 2024-2028 500
17α-Methyltestosterone Immersion Induces Sex Reversal in Female Mandarin Fish (Siniperca Chuatsi) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6365394
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8179324
关于积分的说明 17241158
捐赠科研通 5420478
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2867976
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1845142
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1692604