Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis

角膜磨镶术 激光手术 医学 光折变性角膜切除术 眼科 荟萃分析 激光矫视 视力 小切口晶状体摘除术 随机对照试验 折射误差 角膜 外科 内科学
作者
Daizong Wen,Colm McAlinden,Ian Flitcroft,Ruixue Tu,Qinmei Wang,Jorge L. Alió,John Marshall,Yingying Huang,Benhao Song,Liang Hu,Yun‐e Zhao,Senmiao Zhu,Rongrong Gao,Fangjun Bao,A‐Yong Yu,Yu Ye,Hengli Lian,Jinhai Huang
出处
期刊:American Journal of Ophthalmology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:178: 65-78 被引量:123
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.013
摘要

To compare the postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of all major forms of laser corneal refractive surgeries for correcting myopia.Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the US trial registry was conducted up to November 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting in accordance with the eligibility criteria were included in this review. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.Forty-eight RCTs were identified. For efficacy (uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA]), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) ranking (from best to worst) was femtosecond-based laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), LASIK, small-incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), epipolis (Epi)-LASIK, transepithelial PRK (T-PRK). For predictability (refractive spherical equivalent [SE]), a statistically significant difference was found when FS-LASIK was compared with LASIK (odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.20-4.14), PRK (OR 2.16, 95% CrI 1.15-4.03), LASEK (OR 2.09, 95% CrI 1.08-4.55), and Epi-LASIK (OR 2.74, 95% CrI 1.11-6.20). The SUCRA ranking (from best to worst) was FS-LASIK, T-PRK, LASEK, PRK, LASIK, Epi-LASIK. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) comparisons. For both postoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA ranking results show that some corneal surface ablation techniques (PRK and LASEK) rank highest.This network meta-analysis shows that there were no statistically significant differences in either visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (HOAs and CS). FS-LASIK behaved better in predictability than any other type of surgeries.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
sibo完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
怂怂完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
在水一方应助zoie0809采纳,获得10
4秒前
斯文败类应助yy采纳,获得10
5秒前
sky完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
CodeCraft应助wm采纳,获得10
6秒前
倩倩完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
平淡的香岚完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
黎光发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
不知道取什么昵称完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
dapan0622完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
11发布了新的文献求助500
15秒前
15秒前
哈基米完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
脑洞疼应助风堇采纳,获得10
15秒前
野性的亦玉完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
酷波er应助清脆的惜筠采纳,获得10
16秒前
wanci应助Ldq采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
就生鸭发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
H-China发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
wm发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
陈塘鱼完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
21秒前
21秒前
Tong完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
科研通AI6.2应助乐观海燕采纳,获得10
21秒前
ccc完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
一个圈完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
童diedie发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
高分求助中
Metallurgy at high pressures and high temperatures 2000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 1000
Relationship between smartphone usage in changes of ocular biometry components and refraction among elementary school children 800
The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry 610
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 第六版习题答案 600
应急管理理论与实践 530
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6335875
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8151850
关于积分的说明 17119973
捐赠科研通 5391447
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2857587
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1835162
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1685903