Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis

角膜磨镶术 激光手术 医学 光折变性角膜切除术 眼科 荟萃分析 激光矫视 视力 小切口晶状体摘除术 随机对照试验 折射误差 角膜 外科 内科学
作者
Daizong Wen,Colm McAlinden,Ian Flitcroft,Ruixue Tu,Qinmei Wang,Jorge L. Alió,John Marshall,Yingying Huang,Benhao Song,Liang Hu,Yun‐e Zhao,Senmiao Zhu,Rongrong Gao,Fangjun Bao,A‐Yong Yu,Yu Ye,Hengli Lian,Jinhai Huang
出处
期刊:American Journal of Ophthalmology [Elsevier]
卷期号:178: 65-78 被引量:123
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.013
摘要

To compare the postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of all major forms of laser corneal refractive surgeries for correcting myopia.Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the US trial registry was conducted up to November 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting in accordance with the eligibility criteria were included in this review. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.Forty-eight RCTs were identified. For efficacy (uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA]), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) ranking (from best to worst) was femtosecond-based laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), LASIK, small-incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), epipolis (Epi)-LASIK, transepithelial PRK (T-PRK). For predictability (refractive spherical equivalent [SE]), a statistically significant difference was found when FS-LASIK was compared with LASIK (odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.20-4.14), PRK (OR 2.16, 95% CrI 1.15-4.03), LASEK (OR 2.09, 95% CrI 1.08-4.55), and Epi-LASIK (OR 2.74, 95% CrI 1.11-6.20). The SUCRA ranking (from best to worst) was FS-LASIK, T-PRK, LASEK, PRK, LASIK, Epi-LASIK. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) comparisons. For both postoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA ranking results show that some corneal surface ablation techniques (PRK and LASEK) rank highest.This network meta-analysis shows that there were no statistically significant differences in either visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (HOAs and CS). FS-LASIK behaved better in predictability than any other type of surgeries.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Akim应助Hug采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
lhh完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
saber349完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
lijiawei完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
活力板凳完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
今后应助ffff采纳,获得10
3秒前
墨西哥猪肉卷完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
西里马拉发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
搜集达人应助动听的蛟凤采纳,获得10
5秒前
李李发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
陈少华完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
stargazer完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
111舒舒完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
ddsyg126完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
专注白昼发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
彭于晏应助彩色靖仇采纳,获得10
7秒前
阿绵发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
赫连烙完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
研友_Lw4Ngn完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
白潇潇完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
俊鱼完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
隐形曼青应助忆往昔采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
ccy发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
DXB完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
景辞完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
田様应助西里马拉采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 40000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 2500
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
从k到英国情人 1500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5743471
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5414214
关于积分的说明 15347603
捐赠科研通 4884202
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2625645
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1574504
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1531414