Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis

角膜磨镶术 激光手术 医学 光折变性角膜切除术 眼科 荟萃分析 激光矫视 视力 小切口晶状体摘除术 随机对照试验 折射误差 角膜 外科 内科学
作者
Daizong Wen,Colm McAlinden,Ian Flitcroft,Ruixue Tu,Qinmei Wang,Jorge L. Alió,John Marshall,Yingying Huang,Benhao Song,Liang Hu,Yun‐e Zhao,Senmiao Zhu,Rongrong Gao,Fangjun Bao,A‐Yong Yu,Yu Ye,Hengli Lian,Jinhai Huang
出处
期刊:American Journal of Ophthalmology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:178: 65-78 被引量:123
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.013
摘要

To compare the postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of all major forms of laser corneal refractive surgeries for correcting myopia.Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the US trial registry was conducted up to November 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting in accordance with the eligibility criteria were included in this review. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.Forty-eight RCTs were identified. For efficacy (uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA]), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) ranking (from best to worst) was femtosecond-based laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), LASIK, small-incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), epipolis (Epi)-LASIK, transepithelial PRK (T-PRK). For predictability (refractive spherical equivalent [SE]), a statistically significant difference was found when FS-LASIK was compared with LASIK (odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.20-4.14), PRK (OR 2.16, 95% CrI 1.15-4.03), LASEK (OR 2.09, 95% CrI 1.08-4.55), and Epi-LASIK (OR 2.74, 95% CrI 1.11-6.20). The SUCRA ranking (from best to worst) was FS-LASIK, T-PRK, LASEK, PRK, LASIK, Epi-LASIK. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) comparisons. For both postoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA ranking results show that some corneal surface ablation techniques (PRK and LASEK) rank highest.This network meta-analysis shows that there were no statistically significant differences in either visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (HOAs and CS). FS-LASIK behaved better in predictability than any other type of surgeries.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
靳欣妍完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
幸运星完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
adelalady完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Cikkky发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
bkagyin应助aaaaa888888888采纳,获得10
4秒前
momo完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
灯影完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
up123完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
上官若男应助omega采纳,获得30
9秒前
Tsuki发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
科研通AI2S应助孔不尤采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI6.1应助蛋123_采纳,获得10
10秒前
科研通AI6.2应助蛋123_采纳,获得10
10秒前
可爱的函函应助蛋123_采纳,获得10
10秒前
科研通AI6.3应助蛋123_采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI6.4应助蛋123_采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI6.2应助蛋123_采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
一念之间应助蛋123_采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI6.3应助蛋123_采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI6.4应助蛋123_采纳,获得10
11秒前
火之高兴发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
月月发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
生物学宽度完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
haishuixing2完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Hezzzz完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
二三完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
CodeCraft应助清秀豪英采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
dy260完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
喜悦寒凝完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
小二郎应助白啦啦采纳,获得10
19秒前
李健应助up123采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
Photodetectors: From Ultraviolet to Infrared 500
信任代码:AI 时代的传播重构 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6357956
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8172463
关于积分的说明 17208174
捐赠科研通 5413332
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2865051
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1842584
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1690666