Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis

角膜磨镶术 激光手术 医学 光折变性角膜切除术 眼科 荟萃分析 激光矫视 视力 小切口晶状体摘除术 随机对照试验 折射误差 角膜 外科 内科学
作者
Daizong Wen,Colm McAlinden,Ian Flitcroft,Ruixue Tu,Qinmei Wang,Jorge L. Alió,John Marshall,Yingying Huang,Benhao Song,Liang Hu,Yun‐e Zhao,Senmiao Zhu,Rongrong Gao,Fangjun Bao,A‐Yong Yu,Yu Ye,Hengli Lian,Jinhai Huang
出处
期刊:American Journal of Ophthalmology [Elsevier]
卷期号:178: 65-78 被引量:123
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.013
摘要

To compare the postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of all major forms of laser corneal refractive surgeries for correcting myopia.Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the US trial registry was conducted up to November 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting in accordance with the eligibility criteria were included in this review. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.Forty-eight RCTs were identified. For efficacy (uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA]), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) ranking (from best to worst) was femtosecond-based laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), LASIK, small-incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), epipolis (Epi)-LASIK, transepithelial PRK (T-PRK). For predictability (refractive spherical equivalent [SE]), a statistically significant difference was found when FS-LASIK was compared with LASIK (odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.20-4.14), PRK (OR 2.16, 95% CrI 1.15-4.03), LASEK (OR 2.09, 95% CrI 1.08-4.55), and Epi-LASIK (OR 2.74, 95% CrI 1.11-6.20). The SUCRA ranking (from best to worst) was FS-LASIK, T-PRK, LASEK, PRK, LASIK, Epi-LASIK. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) comparisons. For both postoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA ranking results show that some corneal surface ablation techniques (PRK and LASEK) rank highest.This network meta-analysis shows that there were no statistically significant differences in either visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (HOAs and CS). FS-LASIK behaved better in predictability than any other type of surgeries.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Yuan完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
耿耿儿完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
QWE完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
nn完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
爱偷懒的Q发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
又发了NSC发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
沪上国际完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
开放雪曼发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
酷波er应助默默的豁采纳,获得10
4秒前
嘴嘴发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
吱吱吱吱完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
smith应助mao采纳,获得10
5秒前
搞怪的易槐完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
123td完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研通AI6.3应助Scout采纳,获得10
6秒前
帅气的香之完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
时尚语梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
武陵济世发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
weige发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
发发完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
张张完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
yuanyuan完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
jingran127完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
互助应助魏笑白采纳,获得30
11秒前
超帅飞机发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
积极向上完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Jasper应助chimchim采纳,获得10
12秒前
吱吱吱吱发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
充电宝应助YYT采纳,获得10
13秒前
脑洞疼应助高群采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 9th Edition 500
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6053590
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7873617
关于积分的说明 16278909
捐赠科研通 5198946
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2781701
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1764628
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1646217