医学
腰痛
收缩(语法)
后备箱
重复措施设计
物理疗法
内科学
数学
统计
生态学
生物
病理
替代医学
作者
Vittal R. Nagar,Troy L. Hooper,Gregory S. Dedrick,Jean‐Michel Brismée,Phillip S. Sizer
出处
期刊:Spine
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2014-01-01
卷期号:39 (2): E89-E96
被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000000091
摘要
In Brief Study Design. A 2 (group) × 2 (abdominal contraction) × 2 (reach activity) crossover mixed design with repeated measures for contraction and activity examined the effects of a loaded (4.6 kg) forward-reach activity and abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) on transversus abdominis (TrA) contraction in subjects with nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) history versus controls. Objective. We measured TrA contraction during a loaded forward-reach activity while using the ADIM and examined if a NSLBP history affects TrA activity. Summary of Background Data. The ADIM supports trunk stability during function. Clinicians incorporate ADIM during patients' functional tasks. Pain-free individuals can sustain ADIM during function, such as forward-reach. However, this has not been tested in those with a NSLBP history. Methods. Eighteen normal subjects and 18 subjects with a history of NSLBP participated. A blinded investigator recorded M-mode ultrasound imaging measurements of TrA thickness (mm) during 4 conditions as follows: (1) quiet standing without ADIM; (2) quiet standing with ADIM; (3) loaded forward-reach without ADIM; and (4) loaded forward-reach with ADIM. Results. A mixed analysis of variance demonstrated a significant main effect for group (F [1, 34] = 5.404, P = 0.026; Figure 2), where TrA thickness was greater for NSLBP history (7.41 + 2.34 mm) versus controls (5.9 + 2.46 mm). A significant main effect was observed for abdominal contraction (F [1, 34] = 49.57, P < 0.0001; Figure 3), where TrA thickness was greater during ADIM (7.47 + 2.7 mm) versus without ADIM (5.84, 1.92 m). A significant main effect was observed for forward-reach activity (F [1, 34] = 12.79, P = 0.001; Figure 4), where TrA thickness was greater during a loaded forward-reach (7.04 + 2.6 mm) versus quiet standing (6.2 + 2.4 mm). There were no significant interactions. Conclusion. Individuals can use a volitional pre-emptive ADIM for trunk protection during loaded forward-reach, potentially reducing injury risk. A NSLBP history increases TrA activation during ADIM, suggesting an enhanced protective role. Level of Evidence: 2 M-mode ultrasound imaging measured transversus abdominis contraction in 18 normal subjects and 18 subjects with nonspecific low back pain history (NSLBP) during loaded forward-reach with and without abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM). Significant differences were found in muscle thickness for group (NSLBP > controls), abdominal contraction (ADIM > no ADIM), and reach activity (reach > rest). This suggests a protective utility for ADIM.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI