牙本质
胶粘剂
臼齿
牙科
医学
复合数
树脂复合材料
粘结强度
复合材料
材料科学
图层(电子)
作者
Wanyi Lim,Louise Brearley Messer,Joseph E.A. Palamara
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2014-09-10
卷期号:36 (4): E111-7
被引量:1
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine in vitro the effect of cure mode on the shear bond strength (SBS), failure mode (FM), microleakage (ML), and resin tag penetration (RTP) of two resin composite (RC)/adhesive systems: (1) Clearfil Majesty Esthetic/Clearfil SE Bond (CME/SEB); and (2) TPH 3 Micro Matrix Restorative/Prime&Bond NT (TPH/P&B).Paired RC samples (10 CME/SEB; 10 TPH/P&B) were precured or postcured with adhesive on primary molar dentinal substrates and tested for SBS (10 per group); debonded surfaces were examined. Cavities (Class V) in extracted primary molars were restored (20 CME/SEB; 20 TPH/P&B), following precuring or postcuring the adhesive, and examined for ML (eight per group) and RTP (two per group).Mean SBS (MPa) values differed: precured CME/SEB exceeded postcured CME/SEB (20.16±2.70 versus 10.97±4.39; P<.001), and postcured TPH/P&B exceeded precured TPH/P&B (14.17±3.73 versus 11.10±2.62; P=.007). The FM differed between systems: CME/SEB: precured (four adhesive-dentin; six mixed), postcured (10 adhesive-dentin); TPH/P&B: precured (10 adhesive-dentin), postcured (nine adhesive-dentin; one mixed). Only one specimen showed true ML (postcured TPH/P&B). The RTP was greater in postcured than precured specimens.Precured CME/SEB was deemed superior for restoration of primary teeth, despite extra time required clinically to precure the adhesive.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI