奇纳
主位的
国际功能、残疾和健康分类
医学模型残废
残疾社会模式
透视图(图形)
多学科方法
残疾研究
医疗保健
心理学
护理研究
压迫
护理部
医学
社会学
康复
社会科学
精神科
性别研究
神经科学
人工智能
政治
人类学
心理干预
计算机科学
法学
经济
政治学
经济增长
作者
Christina McMillan Boyles,Patricia Hill Bailey,Sharolyn Mossey
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04623.x
摘要
This paper is a report of an integrative review to explore the way in which disability has been considered in the multidisciplinary health and nursing literature.In the multidisciplinary health and nursing literature, two ways are presented in which disability can be understood: the traditional, functional perspective and a more contemporary, social perspective.Computerized databases of the CINAHL, Proquest Nursing and Allied Health Sources, EBSCO and Evidence Based Medicine Reviews Multifile and Cochrane databases were conducted for papers published in English in the period 1963-2007 using the keywords 'models of disability', 'disability and nursing research' and 'theories of disability'.An integrative review was performed and, of the 11,578 papers identified, 65 were included.The concept of functional disability refers to an individual who is physically 'disabled' and unable to perform expected roles. The concepts of social stigmatization and normalcy are associated with functional disability. In contrast, social disability concerns functional limitations within an individual's experience of living with disability, examining how socially constructed barriers actually 'disable' people. Conventionally, disability research has been conducted from an etic perspective. Researchers contend that a shift towards an understanding from the emic perspective is needed for disability research to be emancipatory.Adoption of a social perspective is necessary to inform an understanding of disability that addresses stigmatization and oppression. Research-informed nursing practice, complemented by supportive health and social policies, could transform the experience of living with disability.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI