人气
收益
星星
经济
心理学
货币经济学
计量经济学
业务
广告
人口经济学
会计
社会心理学
天文
物理
作者
Douglas R. Emery,Xi Li
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0022109009090140
摘要
Abstract We investigate the (sell-side) analyst rankings of Institutional Investor (I/I) and The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), using data from 1993–2005. We find that factors with a primary component of recognition are the most important determinants of the rankings, although performance measures are statistically significant determinants in some cases. The single exception to this finding is with existing WSJ stars, where industry-adjusted investment-recommendation performance is the only significant determinant of repeating as a star. Further, in the year after becoming stars, the recommendations of WSJ stars are significantly worse than those of nonstars; and the recommendations and earnings forecasts of I/I stars, as well as the earnings forecasts of WSJ stars, are not significantly different from those of nonstars. We conclude that these rankings are largely “popularity contests.”
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI