辩证法
知识管理
领域知识
领域(数学分析)
过程(计算)
计算机科学
反对派(政治)
主题专家
民族志
人工智能
社会学
专家系统
数据科学
认识论
政治学
哲学
数学分析
操作系统
政治
法学
数学
人类学
作者
Elmira van den Broek,Anastasia Sergeeva,Marleen Huysman
标识
DOI:10.25300/misq/2021/16559
摘要
The introduction of machine learning (ML)in organizations comes with the claim that algorithms will produce insights superior to those of experts by discovering the “truth” from data. Such a claim gives rise to a tension between the need to produce knowledge independent of domain experts and the need to remain relevant to the domain the system serves. This two-year ethnographic study focuses on how developers managed this tension when building an ML system to support the process of hiring job candidates at a large international organization. Despite the initial goal of getting domain experts “out the loop,” we found that developers and experts arrived at a new hybrid practice that relied on a combination of ML and domain expertise. We explain this outcome as resulting from a process of mutual learning in which deep engagement with the technology triggered actors to reflect on how they produced knowledge. These reflections prompted the developers to iterate between excluding domain expertise from the ML system and including it. Contrary to common views that imply an opposition between ML and domain expertise, our study foregrounds their interdependence and as such shows the dialectic nature of developing ML. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings for the literature on information technologies and knowledge work, information system development and implementation, and human–ML hybrids.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI