Endoscopic transmural drainage tailored to quantity of necrotic debris versus laparoscopic transmural internal drainage for walled-off necrosis in acute pancreatitis: A randomized controlled trial

医学 内窥镜检查 随机对照试验 外科 支架 排水 腹腔镜检查 不利影响 急性胰腺炎 内镜超声 胰腺炎 内科学 生态学 生物
作者
Suryalok Angadi,Soumya Jagannath Mahapatra,Rahul Sethia,Anshuman Elhence,Asuri Krishna,Deepak Gunjan,Om Prakash Prajapati,Subodh Kumar,Virinder Kumar Bansal,Pramod Kumar Garg
出处
期刊:Pancreatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:21 (7): 1291-1298 被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2021.06.006
摘要

Both endoscopic and laparoscopic transmural internal drainage are practiced for drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) following acute pancreatitis (AP) but the superiority of either is not established. Our aim was to compare transperitoneal laparoscopic drainage with endoscopic drainage using either lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) or plastic stents tailored to the amount of necrotic debris in WON.In a randomized controlled trial, adequately powered to exclude the null hypothesis, patients with symptomatic WON were randomized to either endoscopic or laparoscopic drainage. In the endoscopy group, two plastic stents were placed if the WON contained <1/3rd necrotic debris and a LAMS was placed if it was >1/3rd. Primary outcome was resolution of WON within 4 weeks without re-intervention for secondary infection. Secondary outcome was overall success (resolution of WON at 6 months) and adverse events.Forty patients were randomized: 20 to each group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Primary outcome was similar between the groups [16 (80%) in laparoscopy and 15 (75%) in endoscopy group; p = 0.89]. The overall success was similar [18 (90%) in laparoscopy vs. 17 (85%) in endoscopy; p = 0.9]. Median duration of hospital stay was shorter in endoscopy group [4 (4-8) vs. 6 days (5-9); p = 0.03]. Adverse events were comparable between the groups.Laparoscopic drainage was not superior to endoscopic transmural drainage with placement of multiple plastic stent or LAMS depending on the amount of necrotic debris for symptomatic WON in AP. The hospital stay was shorter with the endoscopic approach.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
doclarrin完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
wang完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
4秒前
知行完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
xiaohan发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
筷子夹豆腐脑完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
teborlee完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
MargeryMay完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
不会下文献啊完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
飞翔的荷兰人完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
亦久完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
科研通AI2S应助LiangRen采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
mimi完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
MRM完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
123mmmm发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
wangayting发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
小马甲应助感动的听荷采纳,获得10
16秒前
你好纠结伦完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
胡杨完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
小米完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
文献狗完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
拥挤而独行完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
呆萌滑板完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
Chief完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
筷子夹豆腐脑关注了科研通微信公众号
23秒前
繁荣的忆文完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
番茄炒蛋完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
25秒前
宁静致远完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
sy发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
陈半喆发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
wangayting发布了新的文献求助30
32秒前
迷你蛋黄完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
万里完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
高分求助中
The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (Second Edition, 2024) 1050
Kinetics of the Esterification Between 2-[(4-hydroxybutoxy)carbonyl] Benzoic Acid with 1,4-Butanediol: Tetrabutyl Orthotitanate as Catalyst 1000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Handbook of Qualitative Cross-Cultural Research Methods 600
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3139810
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2790680
关于积分的说明 7796114
捐赠科研通 2447121
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1301574
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626305
版权声明 601176