医学
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
多导睡眠图
脉搏血氧仪
睡眠(系统调用)
睡眠呼吸暂停
呼吸暂停
内科学
麻醉
计算机科学
操作系统
作者
Chia-Rung Wu,Yu‐Kang Tu,Li‐Pang Chuang,Christopher J. Gordon,Ning‐Hung Chen,Pin-Yuan Chen,Faizul Hasan,Maria Dyah Kurniasari,Sri Susanty,Hsiao‐Yean Chiu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101355
摘要
The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Questionnaire (OSA-18), and pulse oximetry (PO) according to OSAS severity. Three electronic databases were searched for studies evaluating sensitivity and specificity of the three tools against the apnea–hypopnea index measured using overnight in-laboratory or in–home polysomnography in children and adolescents from inception until January 11, 2020. A random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate the summary sensitivity and specificity of the tools. We identified 39 studies involving 6131 clinical and community children (aged 2.9–16.7 y). The PSQ exhibited the highest sensitivity (74%) for detecting symptoms of mild pediatric OSAS. The PSQ and PO had comparable sensitivity in screening moderate and severe pediatric OSAS (0.82 and 0.89 vs 0.83 and 0.83, respectively). PO yielded superior specificity in detecting mild, moderate, and severe pediatric OSAS (86%, 75%, and 83%, respectively) than did the PSQ and OSA-18 (all p < 0.05). Age, percentage of girls, index test criteria, methodology quality, and sample size significantly moderated sensitivity and specificity. For early detection of pediatric OSAS, the combined use of PSQ and PO is recommended when polysomnography is not available. CRD42018090571.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI