清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Standard gastroenterologist versus multidisciplinary treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders (MANTRA): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial

医学 功能性胃肠病 随机对照试验 多学科方法 内科学 物理疗法 肠易激综合征 儿科 社会科学 社会学
作者
Chamara Basnayake,Michael A. Kamm,Annalise Stanley,Amy Wilson‐O’Brien,Kathryn Burrell,Isabella Lees-Trinca,Angela Khera,Jim Kantidakis,Olivia Wong,Kate Fox,Nicholas J. Talley,Danny Liew,Michael Salzberg,Alexander J. Thompson
出处
期刊:The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:5 (10): 890-899 被引量:90
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30215-6
摘要

Functional gastrointestinal disorders are common and costly to the health-care system. Most specialist care is provided by a gastroenterologist, but only a minority of patients have improvement in symptoms. Although they have proven to be effective, psychological, behavioural, and dietary therapies are not provided routinely. We aimed to compare the outcome of gastroenterologist-only standard care with multidisciplinary care.In an open-label, single-centre, pragmatic trial, consecutive new referrals of eligible patients aged 18-80 years with Rome IV criteria-defined functional gastrointestinal disorders were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive gastroenterologist-only standard care or multidisciplinary clinic care. The multidisciplinary clinic included gastroenterologists, dietitians, gut-focused hypnotherapists, psychiatrists, and behavioural (biofeedback) physiotherapists. Randomisation was stratified by Rome IV disorder and whether referred from gastroenterology or colorectal clinic. Outcomes were assessed at clinic discharge or 9 months after the initial visit. The primary outcome was a score of 4 (slightly better) or 5 (much better) on a 5-point Likert scale assessing global symptom improvement. Modified intention-to-treat analysis included all patients who attended at least one clinic visit and who had answered the primary outcome question. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03078634.Between March 16, 2017, and May 10, 2018, 1632 patients referred to the hospital gastrointestinal clinics were screened, of whom 442 were eligible for a screening telephone call and 188 were randomly assigned to receive either standard care (n=65) or multidisciplinary care (n=123). 144 patients formed the modified intention-to-treat analysis (n=46 in the standard-care group and n=98 in the multidisciplinary-care group), 90 (63%) of whom were women. 61 (62%) of 98 patients in the multidisciplinary-care group patients saw allied clinicians. 26 (57%) patients in the standard-care group and 82 (84%) patients in the multidisciplinary-care group had global symptom improvement (risk ratio 1·50 [95% CI 1·13-1·93]; p=0·00045). 29 (63%) patients in the standard-care group and 81 (83%) patients in the multidisciplinary-care group had adequate relief of symptoms in the past 7 days (p=0·010). Patients in the multidisciplinary-care group were more likely to experience a 50% or higher reduction in all Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index symptom clusters than were patients in the standard-care group. Of the patients with irritable bowel syndrome, a 50-point or higher reduction in IBS-SSS occurred in 10 (38%) of 26 patients in the standard care group compared with 39 (66%) of 59 patients in the multidisciplinary-care group (p=0·017). Of the patients with functional dyspepsia, a 50% reduction in the Nepean Dyspepsia Index was noted in three (11%) of 11 patients in the standard-care group and in 13 (46%) of 28 in the multidisciplinary-care group (p=0·47). After treatment, the median HADS scores were higher in the standard-care group than in the multidisciplinary-care group (13 [8-20] vs 10 [6-16]; p=0·096) and the median EQ-5D-5L quality of life visual analogue scale was lower in the standard-care group compared with the multidisciplinary-care group (70 [IQR 50-80] vs 75 [65-85]; p=0·0087). The eight SF-36 scales did not differ between the groups at discharge. After treatment, median Somatic Symptom Scale-8 score was higher in the standard-care group than in the multidisciplinary-care group (10 [IQR 7-7] vs 9 [5-13]; p=0·082). Cost per successful outcome was higher in the standard-care group than the multidisciplinary-care group.Integrated multidisciplinary clinical care appears to be superior to gastroenterologist-only care in relation to symptoms, specific functional disorders, psychological state, quality of life, and cost of care for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Consideration should be given to providing multidisciplinary care for patients with a functional gastrointestinal disorder.None.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
莎莎完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
行走完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
缥缈的钻石完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
隐形问萍发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Echoheart完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
郭星星完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
nano完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
jlwang完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
4分钟前
Ava应助Mayweather.luo采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
Mayweather.luo完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
asdfqaz完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
貔貅完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
坦率的跳跳糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
科研通AI2S应助伶俐的迎丝采纳,获得10
6分钟前
小强完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
在水一方应助上山打老虎采纳,获得10
7分钟前
8分钟前
8分钟前
上山打老虎完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
紫熊发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
川藏客完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
子月之路完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
忧伤的绍辉完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
高大的天道完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
紫熊发布了新的文献求助10
10分钟前
三三完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
ewind完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
nav完成签到 ,获得积分10
11分钟前
紫熊完成签到,获得积分10
11分钟前
清爽的冰凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
12分钟前
Candy完成签到 ,获得积分10
12分钟前
even完成签到 ,获得积分10
13分钟前
科研通AI2S应助月军采纳,获得10
16分钟前
16分钟前
Kevin完成签到,获得积分20
17分钟前
18分钟前
隐形问萍发布了新的文献求助10
18分钟前
高分求助中
歯科矯正学 第7版(或第5版) 1004
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 1000
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 1000
Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential (第二版) 1000
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 700
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
Zeitschrift für Orient-Archäologie 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3238996
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2884295
关于积分的说明 8232922
捐赠科研通 2552320
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1380690
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 649071
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 624769