亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Standard gastroenterologist versus multidisciplinary treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders (MANTRA): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial

医学 功能性胃肠病 随机对照试验 多学科方法 内科学 物理疗法 肠易激综合征 儿科 社会科学 社会学
作者
Chamara Basnayake,Michael A. Kamm,Annalise Stanley,Amy Wilson‐O’Brien,Kathryn Burrell,Isabella Lees-Trinca,Angela Khera,Jim Kantidakis,Olivia Wong,Kate Fox,Nicholas J. Talley,Danny Liew,Michael Salzberg,Alexander J. Thompson
出处
期刊:The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:5 (10): 890-899 被引量:90
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30215-6
摘要

Functional gastrointestinal disorders are common and costly to the health-care system. Most specialist care is provided by a gastroenterologist, but only a minority of patients have improvement in symptoms. Although they have proven to be effective, psychological, behavioural, and dietary therapies are not provided routinely. We aimed to compare the outcome of gastroenterologist-only standard care with multidisciplinary care.In an open-label, single-centre, pragmatic trial, consecutive new referrals of eligible patients aged 18-80 years with Rome IV criteria-defined functional gastrointestinal disorders were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive gastroenterologist-only standard care or multidisciplinary clinic care. The multidisciplinary clinic included gastroenterologists, dietitians, gut-focused hypnotherapists, psychiatrists, and behavioural (biofeedback) physiotherapists. Randomisation was stratified by Rome IV disorder and whether referred from gastroenterology or colorectal clinic. Outcomes were assessed at clinic discharge or 9 months after the initial visit. The primary outcome was a score of 4 (slightly better) or 5 (much better) on a 5-point Likert scale assessing global symptom improvement. Modified intention-to-treat analysis included all patients who attended at least one clinic visit and who had answered the primary outcome question. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03078634.Between March 16, 2017, and May 10, 2018, 1632 patients referred to the hospital gastrointestinal clinics were screened, of whom 442 were eligible for a screening telephone call and 188 were randomly assigned to receive either standard care (n=65) or multidisciplinary care (n=123). 144 patients formed the modified intention-to-treat analysis (n=46 in the standard-care group and n=98 in the multidisciplinary-care group), 90 (63%) of whom were women. 61 (62%) of 98 patients in the multidisciplinary-care group patients saw allied clinicians. 26 (57%) patients in the standard-care group and 82 (84%) patients in the multidisciplinary-care group had global symptom improvement (risk ratio 1·50 [95% CI 1·13-1·93]; p=0·00045). 29 (63%) patients in the standard-care group and 81 (83%) patients in the multidisciplinary-care group had adequate relief of symptoms in the past 7 days (p=0·010). Patients in the multidisciplinary-care group were more likely to experience a 50% or higher reduction in all Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index symptom clusters than were patients in the standard-care group. Of the patients with irritable bowel syndrome, a 50-point or higher reduction in IBS-SSS occurred in 10 (38%) of 26 patients in the standard care group compared with 39 (66%) of 59 patients in the multidisciplinary-care group (p=0·017). Of the patients with functional dyspepsia, a 50% reduction in the Nepean Dyspepsia Index was noted in three (11%) of 11 patients in the standard-care group and in 13 (46%) of 28 in the multidisciplinary-care group (p=0·47). After treatment, the median HADS scores were higher in the standard-care group than in the multidisciplinary-care group (13 [8-20] vs 10 [6-16]; p=0·096) and the median EQ-5D-5L quality of life visual analogue scale was lower in the standard-care group compared with the multidisciplinary-care group (70 [IQR 50-80] vs 75 [65-85]; p=0·0087). The eight SF-36 scales did not differ between the groups at discharge. After treatment, median Somatic Symptom Scale-8 score was higher in the standard-care group than in the multidisciplinary-care group (10 [IQR 7-7] vs 9 [5-13]; p=0·082). Cost per successful outcome was higher in the standard-care group than the multidisciplinary-care group.Integrated multidisciplinary clinical care appears to be superior to gastroenterologist-only care in relation to symptoms, specific functional disorders, psychological state, quality of life, and cost of care for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Consideration should be given to providing multidisciplinary care for patients with a functional gastrointestinal disorder.None.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Zed发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
8秒前
11秒前
苏震坤发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
24秒前
25秒前
容若发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
33秒前
情怀应助容若采纳,获得10
46秒前
活力的妙菡完成签到,获得积分20
47秒前
1分钟前
舒服的觅云完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
苏震坤发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
计划完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
葛力完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
葛力发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
gszy1975完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
科研通AI6应助葛力采纳,获得10
2分钟前
老迟到的梦旋完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
一只小锦鲤完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
Licyan完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
容若发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
上官若男应助爱听歌笑寒采纳,获得10
3分钟前
jimmy_bytheway完成签到,获得积分0
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
容若发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
重庆森林发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
网络安全 SEMI 标准 ( SEMI E187, SEMI E188 and SEMI E191.) 1000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Two New β-Class Milbemycins from Streptomyces bingchenggensis: Fermentation, Isolation, Structure Elucidation and Biological Properties 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4611282
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4016845
关于积分的说明 12435757
捐赠科研通 3698687
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2039615
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1072446
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 956127