Standard gastroenterologist versus multidisciplinary treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders (MANTRA): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial

医学 功能性胃肠病 随机对照试验 多学科方法 内科学 物理疗法 肠易激综合征 儿科 社会科学 社会学
作者
Chamara Basnayake,Michael A. Kamm,Annalise Stanley,Amy Wilson‐O’Brien,Kathryn Burrell,Isabella Lees-Trinca,Angela Khera,Jim Kantidakis,Olivia Wong,Kate Fox,Nicholas J. Talley,Danny Liew,Michael Salzberg,Alexander J. Thompson
出处
期刊:The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:5 (10): 890-899 被引量:90
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30215-6
摘要

Functional gastrointestinal disorders are common and costly to the health-care system. Most specialist care is provided by a gastroenterologist, but only a minority of patients have improvement in symptoms. Although they have proven to be effective, psychological, behavioural, and dietary therapies are not provided routinely. We aimed to compare the outcome of gastroenterologist-only standard care with multidisciplinary care.In an open-label, single-centre, pragmatic trial, consecutive new referrals of eligible patients aged 18-80 years with Rome IV criteria-defined functional gastrointestinal disorders were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive gastroenterologist-only standard care or multidisciplinary clinic care. The multidisciplinary clinic included gastroenterologists, dietitians, gut-focused hypnotherapists, psychiatrists, and behavioural (biofeedback) physiotherapists. Randomisation was stratified by Rome IV disorder and whether referred from gastroenterology or colorectal clinic. Outcomes were assessed at clinic discharge or 9 months after the initial visit. The primary outcome was a score of 4 (slightly better) or 5 (much better) on a 5-point Likert scale assessing global symptom improvement. Modified intention-to-treat analysis included all patients who attended at least one clinic visit and who had answered the primary outcome question. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03078634.Between March 16, 2017, and May 10, 2018, 1632 patients referred to the hospital gastrointestinal clinics were screened, of whom 442 were eligible for a screening telephone call and 188 were randomly assigned to receive either standard care (n=65) or multidisciplinary care (n=123). 144 patients formed the modified intention-to-treat analysis (n=46 in the standard-care group and n=98 in the multidisciplinary-care group), 90 (63%) of whom were women. 61 (62%) of 98 patients in the multidisciplinary-care group patients saw allied clinicians. 26 (57%) patients in the standard-care group and 82 (84%) patients in the multidisciplinary-care group had global symptom improvement (risk ratio 1·50 [95% CI 1·13-1·93]; p=0·00045). 29 (63%) patients in the standard-care group and 81 (83%) patients in the multidisciplinary-care group had adequate relief of symptoms in the past 7 days (p=0·010). Patients in the multidisciplinary-care group were more likely to experience a 50% or higher reduction in all Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index symptom clusters than were patients in the standard-care group. Of the patients with irritable bowel syndrome, a 50-point or higher reduction in IBS-SSS occurred in 10 (38%) of 26 patients in the standard care group compared with 39 (66%) of 59 patients in the multidisciplinary-care group (p=0·017). Of the patients with functional dyspepsia, a 50% reduction in the Nepean Dyspepsia Index was noted in three (11%) of 11 patients in the standard-care group and in 13 (46%) of 28 in the multidisciplinary-care group (p=0·47). After treatment, the median HADS scores were higher in the standard-care group than in the multidisciplinary-care group (13 [8-20] vs 10 [6-16]; p=0·096) and the median EQ-5D-5L quality of life visual analogue scale was lower in the standard-care group compared with the multidisciplinary-care group (70 [IQR 50-80] vs 75 [65-85]; p=0·0087). The eight SF-36 scales did not differ between the groups at discharge. After treatment, median Somatic Symptom Scale-8 score was higher in the standard-care group than in the multidisciplinary-care group (10 [IQR 7-7] vs 9 [5-13]; p=0·082). Cost per successful outcome was higher in the standard-care group than the multidisciplinary-care group.Integrated multidisciplinary clinical care appears to be superior to gastroenterologist-only care in relation to symptoms, specific functional disorders, psychological state, quality of life, and cost of care for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Consideration should be given to providing multidisciplinary care for patients with a functional gastrointestinal disorder.None.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
爱思考的小笨笨完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
乐乐乐发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
洪旺旺完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
小兵完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
qyh完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
斯文败类应助blingl采纳,获得50
3秒前
3秒前
careS发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
英姑应助usee采纳,获得10
4秒前
英俊的铭应助123采纳,获得10
4秒前
liubo发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
害怕的问儿完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
圆锥香蕉应助牛姐采纳,获得20
6秒前
无花果应助落后的沛柔采纳,获得10
6秒前
你可真行完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
qyh发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
彩色的芷烟完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
orixero应助明明采纳,获得10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
xliiii发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
wahaha完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
SOO应助boshi采纳,获得10
10秒前
开心的伟宸关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
莫莫莫莫几完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
llj发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
JamesPei应助Clown采纳,获得10
11秒前
ding应助qyh采纳,获得10
11秒前
careS完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
迷路向松完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control, 2nd Edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3987223
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3529513
关于积分的说明 11245651
捐赠科研通 3268108
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804027
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 881303
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 808650