Diabetes Mellitus Lowers the Risk of Aortic Dissection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 荟萃分析 优势比 糖尿病 置信区间 混淆 子群分析 内科学 主动脉夹层 相对风险 队列研究 2型糖尿病 出版偏见 外科 主动脉 内分泌学
作者
Shuangshuang Li,Lei Zhang,Guanglang Zhu,Rui Feng,Jian Zhou,Zaiping Jing
出处
期刊:Annals of Vascular Surgery [Elsevier]
卷期号:74: 209-219 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.12.016
摘要

Background This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between diabetes mellitus and aortic dissection. Methods The PubMed and Embase databases were searched until December 2019 to identify all articles reporting diabetes mellitus and aortic dissection. The pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using random-effects model. Results A total of 14 articles with 15,794 participants, of which 2133 diabetes mellitus patients, were eligible and included in this meta-analysis. The data suggested that diabetes mellitus decreased the risk of aortic dissection. In the subgroup analysis, this association was significant in worldwide studies except for the Chinese cohort and in studies adjusted for confounding factors. The results were stable after sensitivity analysis and no evidence of publication bias was found among studies. Conclusions The result of this meta-analysis indicated that diabetes mellitus was associated with a lower risk of aortic dissection. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between diabetes mellitus and aortic dissection. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched until December 2019 to identify all articles reporting diabetes mellitus and aortic dissection. The pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using random-effects model. A total of 14 articles with 15,794 participants, of which 2133 diabetes mellitus patients, were eligible and included in this meta-analysis. The data suggested that diabetes mellitus decreased the risk of aortic dissection. In the subgroup analysis, this association was significant in worldwide studies except for the Chinese cohort and in studies adjusted for confounding factors. The results were stable after sensitivity analysis and no evidence of publication bias was found among studies. The result of this meta-analysis indicated that diabetes mellitus was associated with a lower risk of aortic dissection.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
拉长的曼雁完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
刚刚
海狗完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
allrubbish完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
冰糖葫芦完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
毛八帝丶完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
7秒前
睡意完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
百香果bxg完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
YGTRECE完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
鹏程发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
万能图书馆应助山丘采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
18秒前
18秒前
想要发文章应助王艳伟采纳,获得10
19秒前
一枚小医生怎么办完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
王崇然完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
余红发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
明理晓绿发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
qqq完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
saeda应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
nano应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
25秒前
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
前世的尘应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
25秒前
25秒前
25秒前
25秒前
高分求助中
求助这个网站里的问题集 1000
Floxuridine; Third Edition 1000
Models of Teaching(The 10th Edition,第10版!)《教学模式》(第10版!) 800
La décision juridictionnelle 800
Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie 800
Nonlocal Integral Equation Continuum Models: Nonstandard Symmetric Interaction Neighborhoods and Finite Element Discretizations 600
Academic entitlement: Adapting the equity preference questionnaire for a university setting 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2872857
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2481439
关于积分的说明 6722046
捐赠科研通 2167107
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1151234
版权声明 585720
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 565175