医学
触诊
脚踝
糖尿病足
超声波
置信区间
体格检查
放射科
糖尿病
脉搏血氧仪
外科
内科学
麻醉
内分泌学
作者
Pasha Normahani,Sepideh Poushpas,Mays Alaa,Vassiliki Bravis,Viknesh Sounderajah,Mohammed Aslam,Usman Jaffer
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2020-12-29
卷期号:276 (5): e605-e612
被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000004545
摘要
Objective: We compared the diagnostic performance of a novel point-of-care duplex ultrasound test (podiatry ankle duplex scan; PAD-scan) against commonly used bedside tests for the detection of PAD in diabetes. Background: PAD is a major risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration and amputation. Its diagnosis is fundamental though challenging. Although a variety of bedside tests are available, there is no agreement as to which is the most useful. PAD-scan may be advantageous over current tests as it allows for vessel visualization and more accurate arterial waveform assessment. However, its accuracy has not been previously evaluated. Methods: From March to October 2019, we recruited 305 patients from 2 diabetic foot clinics. The diagnostic performance of ankle-brachial pressure index, toe-brachial pressure index, transcutaneous pressure of oxygen, pulse palpation, and ankle waveform assessment using PAD-scan and Doppler devices (audible and visual waveform assessment) were assessed. The reference test was a full lower limb duplex ultrasound. Results: Based on the reference test, 202 (66.2%) patients had evidence of PAD. PAD-scan had a significantly higher sensitivity [95%, confidence interval (CI) 90%–97%) as compared to all other tests. Particularly low sensitivities were seen with pulse palpation (43%, CI 36%–50%) and transcutaneous pressure of oxygen (31%, CI 24%–38%). PAD-scan had a lower specificity (77%, CI 67%–84%) compared to toe-brachial pressure index (86%, CI 78%–93%; P < 0.001), but not statistically different when compared to all other tests. Conclusions: PAD-scan has superior diagnostic utility and is a valid first line investigation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI