自动调节
医学
脑自动调节
血压
麻醉
异氟醚
脑血流
血流动力学
血流
心脏病学
内科学
作者
Frank P. Tiecks,Arthur M. Lam,Rune Aaslid,David W. Newell
出处
期刊:Stroke
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:1995-06-01
卷期号:26 (6): 1014-1019
被引量:766
标识
DOI:10.1161/01.str.26.6.1014
摘要
Cerebral autoregulation can be evaluated by measuring relative blood flow changes in response to a steady-state change in the blood pressure (static method) or during the response to a rapid change in blood pressure (dynamic method). The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the two methods in humans with both intact and impaired autoregulatory capacity.Using intraoperative transcranial Doppler sonography recordings from both middle cerebral arteries, we determined static and dynamic autoregulatory responses in 10 normal subjects undergoing elective surgical procedures. The changes in cerebrovascular resistance were estimated from the changes in cerebral blood flow velocity and arterial blood pressure in response to manipulations of blood pressure. Static autoregulation was determined by analyzing the response to a phenylephrine-induced rise in blood pressure, whereas rapid deflation of a blood pressure cuff around one thigh served as a stimulus for testing dynamic autoregulation. Both measurements were performed in patients with intact autoregulation during propofol anesthesia and again in the same patients after autoregulation had been impaired by administration of high-dose isoflurane.There was a significant reduction in autoregulatory capacity after the administration of high-dose isoflurane, which could be demonstrated using static (P < .0001) and dynamic (P < .0001) methods. The correlation between static or steady-state and dynamic autoregulation measurements was highly significant (r = .93, P < .0001).These data show that in normal human subjects measurement of dynamic autoregulation yields similar results as static testing of intact and pharmacologically impaired autoregulation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI