心理学
人际交往
事故(哲学)
社会心理学
人际关系
人为因素与人体工程学
逻辑回归
毒物控制
情感(语言学)
伤害预防
自杀预防
应用心理学
统计
医疗急救
医学
沟通
哲学
认识论
数学
作者
J Mesken,Timo Lajunen,Heikki Summala
出处
期刊:Ergonomics
[Taylor & Francis]
日期:2002-06-01
卷期号:45 (7): 469-483
被引量:205
标识
DOI:10.1080/00140130210129682
摘要
The aim of the present study was to replicate the distinction between errors, lapses and violations, and to identify aggressive violations from normal or highway code violations. Furthermore, the relationship of these behaviours with road traffic accidents was examined. A total number of 1126 Finnish drivers completed a questionnaire containing the Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ) with extended violations scale, and questions regarding background information, such as age, gender and mileage. Also, questions about previous accidents and fines were asked. Factor analysis showed that a four-factor structure seemed more appropriate than the earlier established three-factor structure. The four factors were errors, lapses, speeding violations and interpersonal violations. The two types of violations result from different motives, and seem to be associated with different kinds of affect. Both interpersonal and speeding violations were reported most by young males, which was consistent with earlier findings. Logistic regression analyses indicated that errors predicted active accident involvement after partialling out the effects of demographic variables, whereas interpersonal violations were positively related to involvement in passive accidents. This was presumably due to different reporting tendencies of respondents. Speeding tickets were predicted by speeding and interpersonal violations and lapses and penalties for speeding by both kinds of violations and errors. Penalties for speeding, parking and other offences were predicted by interpersonal violations. The implications of these results are discussed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI