医学
血液透析
家庭血液透析
透析
队列
比率
置信区间
队列研究
不利影响
入射(几何)
急诊医学
重症监护医学
外科
内科学
物理
光学
作者
C. L. Van Eps,Mark Jones,Tsun Gun Ng,David W. Johnson,Scott Campbell,Nicole M. Isbel,David W. Mudge,Elaine Beller,Carmel M. Hawley
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1542-4758.2010.00463.x
摘要
Abstract Few studies adequately document adverse events in patients receiving long, slow, and overnight hemodialysis (NHD). Concerns about high rates of dialysis access complications have been raised. This is an observational cohort study comparing hospital admission rates for vascular access complications between alternate nightly NHD (n=63) and conventional hemodialysis (n=172) patients established on chronic hemodialysis for at least 3 months. Overall, hospital admission rates and hospital admission rates for cardiac and all infective events are also reported. The NHD cohort was younger and less likely to be female, diabetic, or have ischemic heart disease than the conventional hemodialysis cohort. When NHD and buttonhole cannulation technique were used simultaneously, there was a demonstrated increased risk of septic dialysis access events: incidence rate ratio 3.0 (95% confidence interval 1.04–8.66) (P=0.04). The majority of blood culture isolates in NHD patients were gram‐positive organisms, particularly Staphylococcus aureus . Alternate nightly NHD did not significantly change total hospital admissions or hospital admissions for indications other than dialysis access complications, compared with conventional hemodialysis. Our data suggest that buttonhole cannulation technique should be used with caution in patients performing extended‐hours hemodialysis as this combination appears to increase the risk of septic access complications. Randomized‐controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI