医学
重症监护
审计
流行病学
急诊医学
病例组合指数
烧伤
重症监护医学
医疗急救
外科
护理部
内科学
经济
管理
作者
Anne Pernille Toft-Petersen,Paloma Ferrando-Vivas,David A Harrison,Ken Dunn,Kathy Rowan
出处
期刊:Anaesthesia
[Wiley]
日期:2018-05-15
卷期号:73 (9): 1131-1140
被引量:6
摘要
In the UK, a network of specialist centres has been set up to provide critical care for burn patients. However, some burn patients are admitted to general intensive care units. Little is known about the casemix of these patients and how it compares with patients in specialist burn centres. It is not known whether burn-specific or generic risk prediction models perform better when applied to patients managed in intensive care units. We examined admissions for burns in the Case Mix Programme Database from April 2010 to March 2016. The casemix, activity and outcome in general and specialist burn intensive care units were compared and the fit of two burn-specific risk prediction models (revised Baux and Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury models) and one generic model (Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre model) were compared. Patients in burn intensive care units had more extensive injuries compared with patients in general intensive care units (median (IQR [range]) burn surface area 16 (7-32 [0-98])% vs. 8 (1-18 [0-100])%, respectively) but in-hospital mortality was similar (22.8% vs. 19.0%, respectively). The discrimination and calibration of the generic Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre model was superior to the revised Baux and Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury burn-specific models for patients managed on both specialist burn and general intensive care units.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI