西妥昔单抗
医学
内科学
皮疹
肿瘤科
不利影响
结直肠癌
危险系数
临床终点
置信区间
随机对照试验
癌症
作者
Enrique Aranda,Pilar García‐Alfonso,Manuel Benavides,A. Ruiz,Carmen Guillén‐Ponce,María José Safont,Julia Alcaide,A. Gómez,Rafael López‐López,José Luís Manzano,Miguel Méndez Ureña,Javier Sastre,Fernando Rivera,Cristina Grávalos,Teresa García,Jose Ignacio Martin-Valades,E. Falcó,M. Navalón,E. González,A. M. García Tapiador
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.024
摘要
Background This multicentre, randomised, and phase II study evaluated mFOLFOX+cetuximab followed by maintenance mFOLFOX+cetuximab or single-agent cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (NCT01161316). Patients and methods Previously, untreated mCRC patients (wild-type KRAS) were randomised to receive cetuximab+mFOLFOX-6 (8 cycles for 2 weeks) followed by maintenance therapy: single-agent cetuximab (Arm-A) or mFOLFOX-6 + cetuximab (Arm-B) until progression. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 9 months. Results One hundred ninety-three patients (median [range] age 60 [33–74] years) were randomised (2:1): 129 Arm-A versus 64 Arm-B. PFS at 9 months (95% confidence interval) showed non-inferiority between arms (Arm-A/Arm-B: 60 [52, 69]%/72 [61, 83]%, p [non-inferiority]<0.1). There were no statistically significant differences in the PFS (Arm-A/Arm-B: 9 [95% CI 7, 10] months/10 [7,13] months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.19 [0.80, 1.79]) or overall survival (23 [19, 28] months/27 [18, 36] months, HR = 1.24 [0.85, 1.79]) between arms. The objective response rate was also similar (48 [39, 57]%/39 [27, 52]%). The safety profile was similar between arms, and all patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE) (Arm-A/Arm-B grade ≥III AEs: 70%/68%). The most common grade ≥III AEs were as follows: neutropenia (Arm-A/Arm-B: 28%/26%), rash acneiform (15%/24%) and sensory neuropathy (2%/15%) in any group. Arm-A was associated with less grade ≥III rash and sensory neuropathy and a lower rate of serious AEs (20%/27%). Conclusion(s) This phase II exploratory trial with a non-inferiority design suggests that maintenance therapy with single-agent cetuximab following mFOLFOX+cetuximab induction could be a valuable option compared with mFOLFOX+cetuximab treatment continuation. We await phase III trials to confirm single-agent cetuximab as maintenance therapy in mCRC patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI