Provenance and transport mechanism of gravity core sediments in the deep-water area of the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea

Reconstructing the role of provenance and transport mechanism of sediments deposited in deep-water environments is often complex because of myriad of factors such as variability in sediment sources, tectonics, bottom morphology, climatic changes and sea level fluctuations as well as current regime. The South China Sea (SCS) is situated at the tectonic intersection of the Pacific, Eurasian, and Indo-Australian plates, and provides an excellent natural laboratory for understanding source-to-sink transport processes of fluvial sediments. The Qiongdongnan Basin (QDNB) is located in the northern part of the SCS, and the deep-water area (>300 m) of the QDNB has a good hydrocarbon source and hydrocarbon accumulation conditions with a tremendous thickness since the late Miocene-Quaternary. However, the complex sources and transport mechanisms of sediments in the QDNB are undefined. In previous study QDNB may have a major provenance or a mixture of sources. In this paper, the sediments of two cores from the deep-water area of QDNB have been analyzed using several sedimentological and geochemical approaches, including measurements of grain size distribution(433 samples), the occurrence of minerals, and trace element geochemistry(37 samples)as well as strontium and neodymium isotopes(20 samples).The granularity analysis results first show that the 19S37 core can be divided into three stages while the 19S40 core is divided into two stages by clear vertical variations in grain size characteristics. Chlorite (62.0%) and Muscovite (33.6%) appear to be the predominant minerals in the 19S37 core, while the mineral assemblage of sediments from 19S40 mainly consists of kaolinite (37.4%), muscovite (29.2%) and chlorite (27.1%). The primitive mantle standardization curves and chondrite standardized distribution patterns of 19S37 and 19S40 are consistent and display enrichments in Th, U, Pb, and Nd and depletions in Ba, Nb, Sr, and Eu. In addition, the content of Sr fluctuates greatly with depth, which should reflect the influences of sea level changes and the relative proportion of various provenance components. The 143Nd/144Nd ratios and εNd values of the sediments from 19S37 are higher than those of the sediments from 19S40, and all the εNd values show narrow variations and range from −10.085 to −11.080. We conclude that the sediments of the deep-water area in the upper Pleistocene-Holocene were mainly from the sources of the Red River, Taiwan, Pearl River, Hainan Island, and Vietnam. The transport mechanism of the sediments from Hainan Island can be explained by the short distance between the source region and the sedimentary site, while the large amounts of terrigenous sediment inputs derived from the Red River and advantageous morphology make the Red River the largest sediment source to cores 19S37 and 19S40. The transport distance and amount of Deep Water Current could be even more powerful to make Taiwan be the second largest source of modern sediments in QDNB.