清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colon Polyps: Use Both for the Best Outcomes

医学 内镜黏膜下剥离术 肝病学 粘膜切除术 普通外科 内科学 结直肠癌 解剖(医学) 内窥镜检查 胃肠病学 外科 癌症
作者
Nicholas G. Burgess,Michael J. Bourke
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:177 (1): 89-90 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.7326/m23-3185
摘要

Editorials12 December 2023Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colon Polyps: Use Both for the Best OutcomesNicholas G. Burgess, MBChB, BSc, PhD, and Michael J. Bourke, MBBSNicholas G. Burgess, MBChB, BSc, PhDDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, and Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, and Michael J. Bourke, MBBSDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, and Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/M23-3185 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Endoscopic resection has revolutionized the management of large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs), all but removing the need for surgery. Guidelines strongly recommend expert endoscopic assessment of all LNPCPs before consideration of surgery (1, 2). Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has driven this change. Adverse events (AEs) are infrequent and recurrence rates of 1% to 2% are achievable with margin ablation techniques (3). Widely adopted internationally, EMR is efficient, readily learned, and safe. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a more recent advance. The ability to resect lesions completely en bloc has benefits in terms of complete staging and potential cure ...References1. Kaltenbach T, Anderson JC, Burke CA, et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions-recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:486-519. [PMID: 32067745] doi:10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.029 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49:270-297. [PMID: 28212588] doi:10.1055/s-0043-102569 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Sidhu M, Shahidi N, Gupta S, et al. Outcomes of thermal ablation of the mucosal defect margin after endoscopic mucosal resection: a prospective, international, multicenter trial of 1000 large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:163-170.e3. [PMID: 33798525] doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.03.044 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Jacques J, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T, et al. Endoscopic en bloc versus piecemeal resection of large nonpedunculated colonic adenomas. A randomized comparative trial. Ann Intern Med. 2024;177:29-38. doi:10.7326/M23-1812 Google Scholar5. Tate DJ, Desomer L, Argenziano ME, et al. Treatment of adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut. 2023;72:1875-1886. [PMID: 37414440] doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330300 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Burgess NG, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, et al. Risk stratification for covert invasive cancer among patients referred for colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a large multicenter cohort. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:732-742.e1. [PMID: 28583826] doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.047 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. van Hattem WA, Shahidi N, Vosko S, et al. Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective comparison across two successive periods. Gut. 2021;70:1691-1697. [PMID: 33172927] doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321753 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Cronin O, Sidhu M, Shahidi N, et al. Comparison of the morphology and histopathology of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps in the rectum and colon: implications for endoscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;96:118-124. [PMID: 35219724] doi:10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.022 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Ohata K, Kobayashi N, Sakai E, et al. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal epithelial neoplasms: a prospective, multicenter, cohort trial from Japan. Gastroenterology. 2022;163:1423-1434.e2. [PMID: 35810779] doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.07.002 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Shahidi N, Vosko S, Gupta S, et al. A rectum-specific selective resection algorithm optimizes oncologic outcomes for large nonpedunculated rectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21:72-80.e2. [PMID: 35526795] doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.021 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Nicholas G. Burgess, MBChB, BSc, PhD; Michael J. Bourke, MBBSAffiliations: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, and Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaDisclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M23-3185.Corresponding Author: Nicholas G. Burgess, MBChB, BSc, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Corner Darcy and Hawkesbury Roads, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia; e-mail, nicholas.burgess@sydney.edu.au.This article was published at Annals.org on 12 December 2023. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoEndoscopic En Bloc Versus Piecemeal Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Adenomas Jérémie Jacques , Marion Schaefer , Timothée Wallenhorst , Thomas Rösch , Vincent Lépilliez , Stanislas Chaussade , Jérôme Rivory , Romain Legros , Jean-Baptiste Chevaux , Sarah Leblanc , Florian Rostain , Maximilien Barret , Jérémie Albouys , Arthur Belle , Anaïs Labrunie , Pierre-Marie Preux , Hugo Lepetit , Martin Dahan , Thierry Ponchon , Sabrina Crépin , Loïc Marais , Julien Magne , and Mathieu Pioche Metrics Current IssueJanuary 2024Volume 177, Issue 1Page: 89-90KeywordsColorectal cancerEndoscopyGastroenterology and hepatologyPolypectomies ePublished: 12 December 2023 Issue Published: January 2024 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2023 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
WerWu完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
拼搏问薇完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Hiram完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
合不着完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
vbnn完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
帅气的沧海完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
古炮完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
sunny完成签到,获得积分20
3分钟前
金平卢仙发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
theo完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
Jemma31发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
5分钟前
cvvvv发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
cvvvv完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
中中中完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
imi完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
善良元芹完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
Bond完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
波里舞完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
诚心的信封完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
morena应助顺顺采纳,获得10
9分钟前
沙海沉戈完成签到,获得积分0
9分钟前
Jemma31完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
有人应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
10分钟前
vinh完成签到,获得积分10
10分钟前
liu95完成签到 ,获得积分10
11分钟前
11分钟前
12分钟前
大熊完成签到 ,获得积分10
13分钟前
三跳完成签到 ,获得积分10
13分钟前
WZM完成签到 ,获得积分10
14分钟前
bwx完成签到,获得积分10
14分钟前
joe完成签到 ,获得积分0
15分钟前
16分钟前
有人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16分钟前
有人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16分钟前
有人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16分钟前
16分钟前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
叶剑英与华南分局档案史料 500
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3146783
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2798063
关于积分的说明 7826678
捐赠科研通 2454607
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1306394
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627723
版权声明 601527