糖尿病前期
医学
检查表
糖尿病
荟萃分析
梅德林
预测建模
人口
系统回顾
2型糖尿病
内科学
环境卫生
计算机科学
机器学习
心理学
内分泌学
生物
生物化学
认知心理学
作者
Yujin Liu,Sunrui Yu,Wenming Feng,Hangfeng Mo,Yuting Hua,Mei Zhang,Zhichao Zhu,Xiaoping Zhang,Zhen Wu,Lanzhen Zheng,Xiaoqiu Wu,Jiantong Shen,Wei Qiu,Jianlin Lou
摘要
Abstract Aim To provide a systematic overview of diabetes risk prediction models used for prediabetes screening to promote primary prevention of diabetes. Methods The Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched for a comprehensive search period of 30 August 30, 2023, and studies involving diabetes prediction models for screening prediabetes risk were included in the search. The Quality Assessment Checklist for Diagnostic Studies (QUADAS‐2) tool was used for risk of bias assessment and Stata and R software were used to pool model effect sizes. Results A total of 29 375 articles were screened, and finally 20 models from 24 studies were included in the systematic review. The most common predictors were age, body mass index, family history of diabetes, history of hypertension, and physical activity. Regarding the indicators of model prediction performance, discrimination and calibration were only reported in 79.2% and 4.2% of studies, respectively, resulting in significant heterogeneity in model prediction results, which may be related to differences between model predictor combinations and lack of important methodological information. Conclusions Numerous models are used to predict diabetes, and as there is an association between prediabetes and diabetes, researchers have also used such models for screening the prediabetic population. Although it is a new clinical practice to explore, differences in glycaemic metabolic profiles, potential complications, and methods of intervention between the two populations cannot be ignored, and such differences have led to poor validity and accuracy of the models. Therefore, there is no recommended optimal model, and it is not recommended to use existing models for risk identification in alternative populations; future studies should focus on improving the clinical relevance and predictive performance of existing models.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI