Tegoprazan‐Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study in Fujian, China

阿莫西林 幽门螺杆菌 医学 中国 内科学 对偶(语法数字) 随机对照试验 多中心研究 胃肠病学 微生物学 抗生素 地理 生物 艺术 文学类 考古
作者
Xue Yan Lin,Huping Huang,Yijuan Liu,Yanling Zeng,Shiyun Lu,Xuefeng Xu,Lin Yun,Feng Qiu,Fangfang Cai,Jie Pan,Shaozhong Huang,Shaowei Lin,Aiping Lin,Zhi Hui Lin,Xueping Huang
出处
期刊:Helicobacter [Wiley]
卷期号:29 (6)
标识
DOI:10.1111/hel.13151
摘要

ABSTRACT Introduction Few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan‐amoxicillin (TA) dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different dosages of TA dual therapy for H. pylori eradication. Methods This prospective, randomized, open‐label, multicenter study was conducted at four centers in Fujian, China. H. pylori‐ infective patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive one of the following treatments: bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT, esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily + potassium bismuth citrate 240 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1 g twice daily + clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily), tegoprazan‐amoxicillin dual therapies (TA‐qd, tegoprazan 50 mg once daily + amoxicillin 1 g thrice daily; TA‐bid, tegoprazan 50 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1 g thrice daily) for 14 days. The primary outcome was noninferiority in eradication rates of the different TA groups compared to the BQT group. Secondary outcomes encompassed an assessment of adverse reactions and clinical symptom relief. Additionally, exploratory outcomes were focused on the shifts in gut microbiota and a cost‐effectiveness analysis. Results A total of 321 patients were enrolled. The eradication rates in the BQT group, TA‐qd group, and TA‐bid group were 85.05% (91/107), 85.98% (92/107), and 85.98% (92/107) in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (ITT) (BQT vs. TA‐qd, 95% CI −8.50% to 10.36%, noninferiority p = 0.012; BQT vs. TA‐bid, 95% CI −8.50% to 10.36%, noninferiority p = 0.012); 91.00% (91/100), 91.09% (92/101), and 92.93% (92/99) in the modified intention‐to‐treat analysis (mITT) (BQT vs. TA‐qd, 95% CI −7.81% to 7.98%, noninferiority p = 0.006; BQT vs. TA‐bid, 95% CI −5.62% to 9.48%, noninferiority p < 0.001); 90.81% (89/98), 91.00% (91/100), and 93.81% (91/97) in the per‐protocol analysis (PP) (BQT vs. TA‐qd, 95% CI −7.83% to 8.19%, noninferiority p = 0.006; BQT vs. TA‐bid, 95% CI 4.46% to 10.46%, noninferiority p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse reactions in the TA‐qd and TA‐bid groups was significantly lower than in the BQT group (13.33%, 14.56%, and 27.18%, respectively; p = 0.017). The complete remissions of clinical symptoms for BQT, TA‐qd, and TA‐bid were 36.89%, 65.71%, and 68.93%, respectively, had significant differences ( p < 0.001). Two weeks of TA therapy altered gut microbiota diversity and composition, but that recovered 4 weeks after discontinuation. The cost‐effectiveness ratios (CERs) for BQT, TA‐qd, and TA‐bid were 1.85 CNY, 2.08 CNY, and 3.69 CNY, respectively. Conclusion Both TA dual therapies provided satisfactory eradication rates of > 90% for eradicating H. pylori , fewer adverse reactions, and greater clinical symptom relief compared to BQT, with a mild, reversible impact on gut microbiota. In addition, the TA dual therapy with low doses of tegoprazan showed better cost‐effectiveness. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Register and registration No.: ChiCTR2300071997
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
dll完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
NCNST-shi发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
JOKER完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
小七发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
chen7完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小马甲应助WT采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
YQQQ发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
感谢YQQQ转发科研通微信,获得积分50
4秒前
Lieme_7完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
炙热晓露发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
桐桐应助研友_VZGvVn采纳,获得10
7秒前
下文献发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
xiaozhao发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
勇哥发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
优秀剑愁完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
mqthhh完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
5High_0发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
脑洞疼应助麦可采纳,获得30
16秒前
叶子完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
研友_VZGvVn发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
zsyzxb发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
sunshitao发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
桐桐应助離原采纳,获得10
23秒前
研友_VZGvVn完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
阿莫西林发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
熠旅完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
乐乐应助Spine Lin采纳,获得10
26秒前
搜集达人应助zsyzxb采纳,获得10
26秒前
岁寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (Second Edition, 2024) 1050
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY & SKINCARE PRACTICE 388
Case Research: The Case Writing Process 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3141588
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2792521
关于积分的说明 7803368
捐赠科研通 2448740
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1302918
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626665
版权声明 601240