Clinical Decision-Making and Process Complications During Anticipated Difficult Airway Management for Elective Surgery

BACKGROUND: Difficult airway management (DAM) is a challenging aspect of anesthetic care. Although nearly all DAM episodes result in successful intubation, complications are common and clinical decision-making may be complex. In adults with anticipated DAM scheduled for nonemergent surgery, we prospectively observed clinical decisions made during DAM such as awake/sedated versus anesthetized, choice of initial and subsequent devices, case cancellation/postponement, conversions between awake and anesthetized approaches, and process complications such as multiple intubation/supraglottic airway (SGA) insertion attempts, difficult bag-mask ventilation (BMV), hypoxemia, and cardiovascular destabilization. METHODS: From 2009 to 2014, we prospectively observed 1295 episodes of anticipated DAM in a convenience sample of 1245 adults scheduled for nonemergent surgery. Trained observers recorded airway management decisions and process complications during DAM. We described clinical decisions made during DAM and outcomes including number of attempts, need for BMV, hypoxemia, and cardiovascular destabilization. RESULTS: No cases were canceled/postponed for airway management failure and all intubations were eventually successful. Of the 1295 episodes of airway management in our study cohort, 166 (13%) were intubated awake. Patients intubated awake had more difficult airway indicators than those intubated anesthetized, their first-pass success rate was 49%, 30% required ≥3 attempts, 4% required a device change, 50% experienced hypoxemia, and 29% experienced cardiovascular destabilization. Among the 1129 patients intubated while anesthetized, first-pass success rate was 64% and 20% required ≥3 attempts, 11% required a device change, hypoxemia occurred in 30%, and cardiovascular destabilization in 20%. One patient (0.08%) was converted from an anesthetized to an awake approach. Patients with a failed anesthetized intubation attempt and difficult BMV between attempts were at high risk for multiple attempts (67%) and hypoxemia (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Airway management was successful in all patients and the incidence of process complications was higher than in routine airway management. Despite a high risk of DAM, 87% of patients were intubated anesthetized and conversions between awake and anesthetized approaches were rare. That patients intubated awake had more difficult airway indicators implies that clinicians reserve awake intubation for particularly difficult airways. The high incidence of multiple attempts, hypoxemia, and cardiovascular destabilization in patients intubated awake suggests that awake airway management remains challenging. We found no clear pattern in device choices after a first failed attempt. Patients with a first failed anesthetized intubation attempt and difficult BMV were at particularly high risk for hypoxemia.