Fully automatic coronary calcium scoring in non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac CT

医学 组内相关 可靠性(半导体) 置信区间 卡帕 神经组阅片室 冠状动脉钙 科恩卡帕 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 核医学 心脏病学 内科学 机器学习 计算机科学 神经学 功率(物理) 哲学 物理 心理测量学 精神科 临床心理学 量子力学 语言学
作者
Young Joo Suh,Cherry Kim,June‐Goo Lee,Hongmin Oh,Hee Jun Kang,Young‐Hak Kim,Dong Hyun Yang
出处
期刊:European Radiology [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:33 (2): 1254-1265 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00330-022-09117-3
摘要

To validate an artificial intelligence (AI)–based fully automatic coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring system on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)–gated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) using multi-institutional datasets with manual CAC scoring as the reference standard. This retrospective study included 452 subjects from three academic institutions, who underwent both ECG-gated calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) and LDCT scans. For all CSCT and LDCT scans, automatic CAC scoring (CAC_auto) was performed using AI-based software, and manual CAC scoring (CAC_man) was set as the reference standard. The reliability and agreement of CAC_auto was evaluated and compared with that of CAC_man using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. The reliability between CAC_auto and CAC_man for CAC severity categories was analyzed using weighted kappa (κ) statistics. CAC_auto on CSCT and LDCT yielded a high ICC (0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.998–0.999 and 0.989, 95% CI 0.987–0.991, respectively) and a mean difference with 95% limits of agreement of 1.3 ± 37.1 and 0.8 ± 75.7, respectively. CAC_auto achieved excellent reliability for CAC severity (κ = 0.918–0.972) on CSCT and good to excellent but heterogenous reliability among datasets (κ = 0.748–0.924) on LDCT. The application of an AI-based automatic CAC scoring software to LDCT shows good to excellent reliability in CAC score and CAC severity categorization in multi-institutional datasets; however, the reliability varies among institutions. • AI-based automatic CAC scoring on LDCT shows excellent reliability with manual CAC scoring in multi-institutional datasets. • The reliability for CAC score–based severity categorization varies among datasets. • Automatic scoring for LDCT shows a higher false-positive rate than automatic scoring for CSCT, and most common causes of a false-positive are image noise and artifacts for both CSCT and LDCT.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Nexus应助平淡小白菜采纳,获得30
刚刚
AsahiKokura214发布了新的文献求助350
刚刚
情怀应助忧郁的友琴采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
toofe发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
玩命的傲南完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
卢西发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
可靠的难胜完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
寒冰寒冰完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
苹果发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ksksksk完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
fan完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
木头人应助鹓鹓采纳,获得10
5秒前
科研通AI6.2应助心灵美莺采纳,获得10
5秒前
雪影完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Lucas应助一只虾球采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
CipherSage应助平常叫兽采纳,获得10
6秒前
不安书雁完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
穆振家发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
LL完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
AIRRS发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
kkkk完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
gfreezer完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
捏个小雪团完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
zhengyf发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
shauwy完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
呆呆完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
July完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
脑洞疼应助Peterzf采纳,获得10
9秒前
Rossie完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
咳嗽・喀痰の診療ガイドライン第2版2025 800
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Electrode Potentials 550
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 500
The globalisation of real estate: the politics and practice of foreign real estate investment 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7008577
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8682651
关于积分的说明 18405446
捐赠科研通 6492924
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3104095
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2172630
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2080164