Fully automatic coronary calcium scoring in non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac CT

医学 组内相关 可靠性(半导体) 置信区间 卡帕 神经组阅片室 冠状动脉钙 科恩卡帕 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 核医学 心脏病学 内科学 机器学习 计算机科学 神经学 功率(物理) 哲学 物理 心理测量学 精神科 临床心理学 量子力学 语言学
作者
Young Joo Suh,Cherry Kim,June‐Goo Lee,Hongmin Oh,Hee Jun Kang,Young‐Hak Kim,Dong Hyun Yang
出处
期刊:European Radiology [Springer Nature]
卷期号:33 (2): 1254-1265 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00330-022-09117-3
摘要

To validate an artificial intelligence (AI)–based fully automatic coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring system on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)–gated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) using multi-institutional datasets with manual CAC scoring as the reference standard. This retrospective study included 452 subjects from three academic institutions, who underwent both ECG-gated calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) and LDCT scans. For all CSCT and LDCT scans, automatic CAC scoring (CAC_auto) was performed using AI-based software, and manual CAC scoring (CAC_man) was set as the reference standard. The reliability and agreement of CAC_auto was evaluated and compared with that of CAC_man using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. The reliability between CAC_auto and CAC_man for CAC severity categories was analyzed using weighted kappa (κ) statistics. CAC_auto on CSCT and LDCT yielded a high ICC (0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.998–0.999 and 0.989, 95% CI 0.987–0.991, respectively) and a mean difference with 95% limits of agreement of 1.3 ± 37.1 and 0.8 ± 75.7, respectively. CAC_auto achieved excellent reliability for CAC severity (κ = 0.918–0.972) on CSCT and good to excellent but heterogenous reliability among datasets (κ = 0.748–0.924) on LDCT. The application of an AI-based automatic CAC scoring software to LDCT shows good to excellent reliability in CAC score and CAC severity categorization in multi-institutional datasets; however, the reliability varies among institutions. • AI-based automatic CAC scoring on LDCT shows excellent reliability with manual CAC scoring in multi-institutional datasets. • The reliability for CAC score–based severity categorization varies among datasets. • Automatic scoring for LDCT shows a higher false-positive rate than automatic scoring for CSCT, and most common causes of a false-positive are image noise and artifacts for both CSCT and LDCT.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cxy发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
高大厉发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
雪鱼发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
乃思发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
霍金斯1990发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
GFR发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
talpionchen完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
治水发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
Anesthesialy发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
朴素傲松发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
suyu完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
源正生物发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
winga完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
li完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
科目三应助张lulu采纳,获得10
5秒前
Jasper应助WHTTTTT采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
善学以致用应助ZZ采纳,获得10
7秒前
聪明中心完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
asdfzxcv应助阿言采纳,获得10
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
魏煜佳完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
明亮尔蓝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
10秒前
明亮尔蓝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
东东完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
10秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
VASCULITIS(血管炎)Rheumatic Disease Clinics (Clinics Review Articles) —— 《风湿病临床》(临床综述文章) 1000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5971712
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7288942
关于积分的说明 15992394
捐赠科研通 5109548
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2744066
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1709783
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1621760