已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Fully automatic coronary calcium scoring in non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac CT

医学 组内相关 可靠性(半导体) 置信区间 卡帕 神经组阅片室 冠状动脉钙 科恩卡帕 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 核医学 心脏病学 内科学 机器学习 计算机科学 神经学 功率(物理) 哲学 物理 心理测量学 精神科 临床心理学 量子力学 语言学
作者
Young Joo Suh,Cherry Kim,June‐Goo Lee,Hongmin Oh,Hee Jun Kang,Young‐Hak Kim,Dong Hyun Yang
出处
期刊:European Radiology [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:33 (2): 1254-1265 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00330-022-09117-3
摘要

To validate an artificial intelligence (AI)–based fully automatic coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring system on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)–gated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) using multi-institutional datasets with manual CAC scoring as the reference standard. This retrospective study included 452 subjects from three academic institutions, who underwent both ECG-gated calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) and LDCT scans. For all CSCT and LDCT scans, automatic CAC scoring (CAC_auto) was performed using AI-based software, and manual CAC scoring (CAC_man) was set as the reference standard. The reliability and agreement of CAC_auto was evaluated and compared with that of CAC_man using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. The reliability between CAC_auto and CAC_man for CAC severity categories was analyzed using weighted kappa (κ) statistics. CAC_auto on CSCT and LDCT yielded a high ICC (0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.998–0.999 and 0.989, 95% CI 0.987–0.991, respectively) and a mean difference with 95% limits of agreement of 1.3 ± 37.1 and 0.8 ± 75.7, respectively. CAC_auto achieved excellent reliability for CAC severity (κ = 0.918–0.972) on CSCT and good to excellent but heterogenous reliability among datasets (κ = 0.748–0.924) on LDCT. The application of an AI-based automatic CAC scoring software to LDCT shows good to excellent reliability in CAC score and CAC severity categorization in multi-institutional datasets; however, the reliability varies among institutions. • AI-based automatic CAC scoring on LDCT shows excellent reliability with manual CAC scoring in multi-institutional datasets. • The reliability for CAC score–based severity categorization varies among datasets. • Automatic scoring for LDCT shows a higher false-positive rate than automatic scoring for CSCT, and most common causes of a false-positive are image noise and artifacts for both CSCT and LDCT.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
rx123完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
小一完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
orixero应助TCMning采纳,获得10
5秒前
洋芋二号完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
圈圈圆了完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Zhou应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
zzhc应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
7秒前
大苦瓜2号发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
涛老三完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
超帅飞鸟关注了科研通微信公众号
12秒前
学习学习学习完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
千早爱音完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
Ava应助My_magnum_opus采纳,获得10
17秒前
在水一方应助大苦瓜2号采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
火星完成签到 ,获得积分0
26秒前
超帅飞鸟发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
naomi完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
32秒前
TCMning发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
所所应助TCMning采纳,获得10
39秒前
失落沙洲发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
科研狗发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
ZZZZZZJ完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
Owen应助没烦恼采纳,获得10
43秒前
可靠路灯完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
44秒前
Havoc完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
墙雨轩发布了新的文献求助20
45秒前
49秒前
49秒前
53秒前
大苦瓜2号发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
54秒前
54秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Autoparametric Resonance in Mechanical Systems 1000
Effects of Two Weeks of Red Light Therapy on Choroidal Thickness and Axial Length in Young Adults 700
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 600
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
the fractional Laplacian 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7667411
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9236503
关于积分的说明 19880158
捐赠科研通 7236654
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3283924
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2442747
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2285389