已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Fully automatic coronary calcium scoring in non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac CT

医学 组内相关 可靠性(半导体) 置信区间 卡帕 神经组阅片室 冠状动脉钙 科恩卡帕 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 核医学 心脏病学 内科学 机器学习 计算机科学 神经学 功率(物理) 哲学 物理 心理测量学 精神科 临床心理学 量子力学 语言学
作者
Young Joo Suh,Cherry Kim,June‐Goo Lee,Hongmin Oh,Hee Jun Kang,Young‐Hak Kim,Dong Hyun Yang
出处
期刊:European Radiology [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:33 (2): 1254-1265 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00330-022-09117-3
摘要

To validate an artificial intelligence (AI)–based fully automatic coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring system on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)–gated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) using multi-institutional datasets with manual CAC scoring as the reference standard. This retrospective study included 452 subjects from three academic institutions, who underwent both ECG-gated calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) and LDCT scans. For all CSCT and LDCT scans, automatic CAC scoring (CAC_auto) was performed using AI-based software, and manual CAC scoring (CAC_man) was set as the reference standard. The reliability and agreement of CAC_auto was evaluated and compared with that of CAC_man using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. The reliability between CAC_auto and CAC_man for CAC severity categories was analyzed using weighted kappa (κ) statistics. CAC_auto on CSCT and LDCT yielded a high ICC (0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.998–0.999 and 0.989, 95% CI 0.987–0.991, respectively) and a mean difference with 95% limits of agreement of 1.3 ± 37.1 and 0.8 ± 75.7, respectively. CAC_auto achieved excellent reliability for CAC severity (κ = 0.918–0.972) on CSCT and good to excellent but heterogenous reliability among datasets (κ = 0.748–0.924) on LDCT. The application of an AI-based automatic CAC scoring software to LDCT shows good to excellent reliability in CAC score and CAC severity categorization in multi-institutional datasets; however, the reliability varies among institutions. • AI-based automatic CAC scoring on LDCT shows excellent reliability with manual CAC scoring in multi-institutional datasets. • The reliability for CAC score–based severity categorization varies among datasets. • Automatic scoring for LDCT shows a higher false-positive rate than automatic scoring for CSCT, and most common causes of a false-positive are image noise and artifacts for both CSCT and LDCT.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lily完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
zzu完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
风起云涌完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
貔貅完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
9秒前
活力的尔蓉完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
12秒前
lazy完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
半拉油豆角完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
阿腾发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
贪玩的采白完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
Norlha发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
云间山很困完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Green完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
20秒前
reece完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
CipherSage应助pp采纳,获得10
22秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
香蕉觅云应助Artra_Soong采纳,获得10
28秒前
28秒前
孤蚀月完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
卿霜完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
HuLL完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
羽宇发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
黄河学者完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
34秒前
pp发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
35秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
36秒前
chenlin应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
36秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
36秒前
jiangmi完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
37秒前
38秒前
sunorshine发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
阿姨洗铁路完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
Pediatric Dermoscopy Trichoscopy & Onychoscopy 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
International Security Studies and Technology :Approaches, Assessments, and Frontiers 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7571366
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9150932
关于积分的说明 19572452
捐赠科研通 7156453
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3264043
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2429357
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2254183