Comparison of Complications and Visual Outcomes of Combined Phacovitrectomy versus Standalone Phacoemulsification: A Multicenter Database Study

Purpose: To compare the rates of intraoperative complications, cystoid macular edema (CME), and visual outcomes in eyes that underwent combined phacovitrectomy (Phaco-PPV) to those with standalone phacoemulsification. Setting: A multicenter database study across 8 ophthalmology departments in the United Kingdom. Design: Retrospective, nonrandomized, multicenter comparative study. Methods: We extracted data for patients who underwent Phaco-PPV and standalone phacoemulsification from January 2000 through May 2015. The primary study outcomes were the rates of intraoperative complications and CME after surgery. Results: The study included 2222 eyes in the combined Phaco-PPV group and 112689 in the standalone phacoemulsification group. The combined Phaco-PPV group had a higher incidence of posterior capsule rupture (2.7% vs. 1.7%), dropped lens fragments (0.5% vs. 0.2%), suprachoroidal hemorrhage (0.4% vs. 0.1%), and cystoid macular edema (3.6 vs. 1.1%) (P<0.001). The mean preoperative visual acuity (VA) was lower in the combined Phaco-PPV group, with a mean VA of 0.98 vs 0.68 logMAR (Snellen ∼20/200 vs. 20/100) in the standalone phacoemulsification group (P<0.001). Visual acuity at 24 weeks was lower in the combined Phaco-PPV group (mean VA 0.67 vs. 0.22 logMAR (Snellen ∼20/100 vs. 20/32), P<0.001). Conclusion: Combined Phaco-PPV had higher rates of intraoperative complications and CME, along with a lower postoperative visual acuity when compared to standalone phacoemulsification surgery.