Single vs double umbilical cord blood transplantation in acute leukemia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

荟萃分析 脐血移植 医学 脐带 移植 白血病 急性白血病 系统回顾 肿瘤科 梅德林 内科学 免疫学 造血干细胞移植 生物 生物化学
作者
Peter Olujimi Odutola,Peter Oluwatobi Olorunyomi,Ifeoluwapo Olorunyomi
出处
期刊:Leukemia Research [Elsevier]
卷期号:142: 107517-107517 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107517
摘要

Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has emerged as a promising treatment option for patients with acute leukemia needing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Both single (sUCBT) and double cord blood units (dUCBT) demonstrate potential benefits, but studies comparing their effectiveness have shown mixed results. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of sUCBT versus dUCBT in acute leukemia patients. Electronic databases were systematically examined to identify relevant studies comparing single vs double UCBT published until November 2023. Nine studies involving 3864 acute leukemia patients undergoing UCBT were included. Outcomes analyzed were acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, relapse, non-relapse mortality, leukemia-free survival and overall survival. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The risk of Grade II-IV acute GVHD (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19–2.03) and Grade III-IV acute GVHD (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07–1.46) were significantly higher with dUCBT. Relapse risk was lower with dUCBT (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.88) while overall survival favored sUCBT (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06–1.46). No significant differences were observed for chronic GVHD, non-relapse mortality or leukemia-free survival. Both single and double UCBT have potential as effective treatments for acute leukemia. The choice of treatment should consider various factors, including the risk of GVHD, relapse, and mortality. More research, especially randomized trials, is needed to provide definitive guidance on the optimal use of single and double unit UCBT in patients with acute leukemia.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
HQQ发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
祁夫人完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
达分歧发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
喜悦的皮卡丘完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
Raewenning发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
大气摩托发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
David_xx发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
云渺发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
KYST完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
科研通AI6应助小刘采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
包妹发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
zl12应助大气摩托采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
oVUVo完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
帅气诗槐发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
华仔应助guohao采纳,获得10
16秒前
完美世界应助云渺采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
oVUVo发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
Tethys完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
yun发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
Limerencia发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
faustss完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
所所应助wei采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
化妆品原料学 1000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 1000
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
nephSAP® Nephrology Self-Assessment Program - Hypertension The American Society of Nephrology 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5633272
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4728777
关于积分的说明 14985477
捐赠科研通 4791228
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2558809
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1519258
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1479548