Single vs double umbilical cord blood transplantation in acute leukemia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

荟萃分析 脐血移植 医学 脐带 移植 白血病 急性白血病 系统回顾 肿瘤科 梅德林 内科学 免疫学 造血干细胞移植 生物 生物化学
作者
Peter Olujimi Odutola,Peter Oluwatobi Olorunyomi,Ifeoluwapo Olorunyomi
出处
期刊:Leukemia Research [Elsevier]
卷期号:142: 107517-107517 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107517
摘要

Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has emerged as a promising treatment option for patients with acute leukemia needing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Both single (sUCBT) and double cord blood units (dUCBT) demonstrate potential benefits, but studies comparing their effectiveness have shown mixed results. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of sUCBT versus dUCBT in acute leukemia patients. Electronic databases were systematically examined to identify relevant studies comparing single vs double UCBT published until November 2023. Nine studies involving 3864 acute leukemia patients undergoing UCBT were included. Outcomes analyzed were acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, relapse, non-relapse mortality, leukemia-free survival and overall survival. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The risk of Grade II-IV acute GVHD (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19–2.03) and Grade III-IV acute GVHD (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07–1.46) were significantly higher with dUCBT. Relapse risk was lower with dUCBT (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.88) while overall survival favored sUCBT (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06–1.46). No significant differences were observed for chronic GVHD, non-relapse mortality or leukemia-free survival. Both single and double UCBT have potential as effective treatments for acute leukemia. The choice of treatment should consider various factors, including the risk of GVHD, relapse, and mortality. More research, especially randomized trials, is needed to provide definitive guidance on the optimal use of single and double unit UCBT in patients with acute leukemia.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6应助三色采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
隐形曼青应助哈哈哈采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
sdysdbd完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
共享精神应助wsqg123采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
芒狗发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
铁观音发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
超级李包包关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
上官若男应助鲤鱼酸奶采纳,获得10
7秒前
善学以致用应助小巧冷菱采纳,获得50
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
vane发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
刘明升发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
芭温行由发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
活泼学生完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
安平发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
思源应助君无邪采纳,获得10
10秒前
这瓜不卖发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
堇瓜完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
Vegetable_Dog发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
英姑应助爱撒娇的朋友采纳,获得10
13秒前
俊秀的笑槐发布了新的文献求助100
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
nephSAP® Nephrology Self-Assessment Program - Hypertension The American Society of Nephrology 500
Digital and Social Media Marketing 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5625702
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4711480
关于积分的说明 14955860
捐赠科研通 4779568
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2553797
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1515710
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1475906