Defining Benchmarks for Pelvic Exenteration Surgery
医学
盆腔切除术
外科
普通外科
作者
Kilian G. M. Brown,Michael J. Solomon,Cherry Koh,Paul Sutton,Samuel Aguiar,Tiago S. Bezerra,H.W. Clouston,Ashwin Desouza,Eric J. Dozois,Amanda L. Ersryd,Frank Frizelle,Jonas Amstrup Funder,Julio García‐Aguilar,Richard Garfinkle,Tamara Glyn,Alexander G. Heriot,Yukihide Kanemitsu,Chia Yew Kong,Helle Ø Kristensen,Songphol Malakorn
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)] 日期:2024-05-15卷期号:282 (6): 1118-1126被引量:11
Objective: To establish globally applicable benchmark outcomes for pelvic exenteration (PE) in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), using outcomes achieved at highly specialised centres. Background: PE is established as the standard of care for selected patients with LARC and LRRC. There are currently no available benchmarks against which surgical performance in PE can be compared for audit and quality improvement. Methods: This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing PE for LARC or LRRC at 16 highly experienced centres between 2018 and 2023. Ten outcome benchmarks were established in a lower-risk subgroup. Benchmarks were defined by the 75th percentile of the results achieved at the individual centres. Results: Seven hundred sixty-three patients underwent PE, of which 464 patients (61%) had LARCs and 299 (39%) had LRRCs. Five hundred forty-four patients (71%) who met predefined lower-risk criteria formed the benchmark cohort. For patients with LARC, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤44%; Comprehensive Complication Index: ≤30.2; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤4.3%; R0 resection rate: ≥79%. For patients with LRRC, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤53%; Comprehensive Complication Index: ≤34.1; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤6%; R0 resection rate: ≥77%. Conclusions: The reported benchmarks for PE in patients with LARC and LRRC represent the best available care for this patient group globally and can be used for rigorous assessment of surgical quality and to facilitate quality improvement initiatives at international exenteration centres.