医学
诊断优势比
优势比
置信区间
荟萃分析
内科学
肺炎
多重聚合酶链反应
诊断试验中的似然比
微生物培养
金标准(测试)
呼吸道感染
呼吸系统
微生物学
聚合酶链反应
细菌
生物
基因
生物化学
遗传学
作者
Andrea P. Moy,Antoine Kimmoun,Thomas Merkling,Béatrice Berçot,François Caméléna,Thibaut Poncin,Benjamin Deniau,Alexandre Mebazaa,Emmanuel Dudoignon,François Dépret,Nabil Gastli,Vincent Cattoir,Naouale Maataoui,Laurence Armand-Lefèvre,Barend Mitton,Jonathan Hoover,John R. Greenland,Brunella Posteraro,Maurizio Sanguinetti,Evdoxia Kyriazopoulou,Evangelos J. Giamarellos‐Bourboulis,Giulia Menchinelli,Brune Joannard
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101300
摘要
Accuracy and timing of antibiotic therapy remain a challenge for lower respiratory tract infections. New molecular techniques using Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction, including the FilmArray® Pneumonia Plus Panel [FAPP], have been developed to address this. The aim of this study is to evaluate the FAPP diagnostic performance for the detection of the 15 typical bacteria of the panel from respiratory samples in a meta-analysis from a systematic review.We searched PubMed and EMBASE from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2022, and selected any study on the FAPP diagnostic performance on respiratory samples compared to the reference standard, bacterial culture. The main outcome was the overall diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity and specificity. We calculated the log Diagnostic Odds Ratio and analyzed performance for separate bacteria, antimicrobial resistance genes, and according to the sample type. We also reported the FAPP turnaround time and the out-of-panel bacteria number and species. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021226280).From 10 317 records, we identified 30 studies including 8 968 samples. Twenty-one were related to intensive care. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 94% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 91-95] and 98% [95%CI 97-98], respectively. The log Diagnostic Odds Ratio was 6.35 [95%CI 6.05-6.65]. 9.3% [95%CI 9.2-9.5] of bacteria detected in culture were not included in the FAPP panel.This systematic review reporting the FAPP evaluation revealed a high accuracy. This test may represent an adjunct tool for pulmonary bacterial infection diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship. Further evidence is needed to assess the impact on clinical outcome.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI