奖学金
灵丹妙药
体育
工程伦理学
通用学习设计
社会学
认识论
教育研究
教育学
心理学
政治学
医学
工程类
法学
哲学
替代医学
病理
作者
Justin A. Haegele,Steven K. Holland,Wesley J. Wilson,Anthony Maher,T. N. Kirk,A. L. MASON
标识
DOI:10.1177/1356336x231202658
摘要
Universal design for learning (UDL) has been advocated for by adapted physical education scholars as a panacea to the challenges associated with teaching disabled and nondisabled students together in physical education. So much so that UDL currently occupies a privileged and largely unquestioned position in adapted physical education scholarship and practice, until now. To move scholarship forward, this article draws on published theoretical and empirical work relating to UDL generally and in physical education in particular to critically discuss the scientific research supporting, or not, the use of UDL as a so-called inclusive approach. We end this article with a call to action for scholars in this field, ourselves included, to conduct theoretically guided and empirically informed research relating to UDL in physical education, which adheres to established hallmarks of research quality that are tied to the ontological and epistemological assumptions of researchers because, at present, it is conspicuous by its absence.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI